Literature DB >> 35624019

Prevalence And Impact of Medical Comorbidities in A Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Population.

Harris Majeed1, Hong Zhu2, Sarah A Williams3, Heidi A Hamann4, Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu5, Jessica Lee6, Noel O Santini7, Travis Browning8, Tanushree Prasad6, Joyce O Adesina5, Minh Do5, David Balis7, Juana Gamarra de Willams5, Ellen Kitchell5, David H Johnson9, Simon J Craddock Lee2, David E Gerber10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening trials generally enroll motivated, relatively healthy, and adherent populations. We therefore evaluated the prevalence and effects of comorbidities in a real-world population undergoing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We calculated the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of patients for whom an initial low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening was ordered between February 2017 and February 2019 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. We examined the association between CCI and initial LDCT completion using multivariable logistic regression, assessed the association between specific medical comorbidity and LDCT completion using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate, and examined the association between CCI and LDCT Lung-RADS results using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: A total of 1358 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 63 years, 57% were women, and 50% were Black. Patients had moderate comorbidity burden (median CCI 3) with chronic pulmonary disease the most common comorbidity. Overall, 943 LDCT (70%) were completed. There was no difference in 30-day, 90-day, or 1-year completion rates of initial LDCT according to CCI. However, 30-day LDCT completion rates did increase over time (P < .001). Lung-RADS scores were not associated with CCI.
CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, patients undergoing lung cancer screening have moderate comorbidity burden. The degree and type of medical comorbidity are not associated with initial screening completion or results. Timeliness of LDCT completion may improve as program experience increases.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Comorbidity; Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT); Lung-RADS; Safety-net

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35624019      PMCID: PMC9287827          DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.840


  50 in total

1.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Baseline Characteristics and Mortality Outcomes of Control Group Participants and Eligible Non-Responders in the NELSON Lung Cancer Screening Study.

Authors:  Uraujh Yousaf-Khan; Nanda Horeweg; Carlijn van der Aalst; Kevin Ten Haaf; Mathijs Oudkerk; Harry de Koning
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Patient navigation for lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net system: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Noel O Santini; Suhny Abbara; Hsienchang Chiu; Molly McGuire; Lisa Quirk; Hong Zhu; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Cancer screening among patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Camelia S Sima; Katherine S Panageas; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Conceptual and Statistical Interpretation of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Patient Adherence to Lung-RADS-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States.

Authors:  Mogana Sundari Rajagopal; Raghul Senthilnathan; Gothandam Km; Ravishankar Ram M; Suja Samiappan; Rama Jayaraj
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Tracking the Nonenrolled: Lung Cancer Screening Patterns Among Individuals not Accrued to a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Claudia Chavez; Olivia Dorsey; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Cristhiaan D Ochoa; Joyce Adesina; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Eric Steen; Hong Zhu; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Racial disparities and treatment trends in a large cohort of elderly black and white patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dale Hardy; Chih-Chin Liu; Rui Xia; Janice N Cormier; Wenyaw Chan; Arica White; Keith Burau; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Transportation and Other Nonfinancial Barriers Among Uninsured Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Samin Panahi; Zobayer Ahmmad; Mu Pye; Jeanie Ashby
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-05

10.  Clinician Variation in Ordering and Completion of Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Medical System.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Olivia Dorsey; Chul Ahn; Jessica L Phillips; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Cristhiaan D Ochoa; Joyce Adesina; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Eric Steen; Harris Majeed; Amrit Gonugunta; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.