Literature DB >> 20644125

Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience.

C Max Schmidt1, Olivier Turrini, Purvi Parikh, Michael G House, Nicholas J Zyromski, Atilla Nakeeb, Thomas J Howard, Henry A Pitt, Keith D Lillemoe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume in performing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: From 1980 through 2007, 1003 patients underwent PD by 19 surgeons at a university hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient morbidity and mortality, quality of resection, and learning curve were examined according to hospital volume (period 1: 1980-2003 vs period 2: 2004-2007), surgeon experience (total number of PDs), and surgeon volume (number of PDs per year).
RESULTS: Perioperative morbidity and mortality for all 1003 PDs were 41% and 3%, respectively. Differences existed between period 1 and period 2 in percentage of PDs performed in elderly patients (7% vs 17%), mortality (4% vs 2%), estimated blood loss (1817 mL vs 780 mL), length of stay (18 days vs 12 days), and proportion of International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula grade C pancreatic fistulae (29% vs 12%). Surgeons with less experience (<50 PDs) performed PD with higher morbidity (53% vs 39%), pancreatic fistula rate (20% vs 10%), estimated blood loss (1918 mL vs 1101 mL), and operative time (458 minutes vs 335 minutes) compared with surgeons with more experience (> or =50 PDs). Experienced surgeons had comparable outcomes irrespective of annual volume. Mortality, margins, and number of lymph nodes resected were not affected by surgeon experience or surgeon volume. Learning curves projected that less experienced surgeons would achieve morbidity and mortality rates equivalent to those of experienced surgeons when they reached 20 and 60 PDs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in PD outcomes, including mortality, occurred with increased PD volume at a pancreatic center. Surgeon experience remained an important determinant of overall morbidity. Experienced surgeons, however, had comparable outcomes irrespective of annual volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20644125     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  117 in total

1.  A modern approach to teaching pancreatic surgery: stepwise pancreatoduodenectomy for trainees.

Authors:  Gabriele Marangoni; Gareth Morris-Stiff; Sunita Deshmukh; Abdul Hakeem; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Giuseppe Malleo; Claudio Bassi; Michael H Sprys; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Aljamir D Chedid; Marcio F Chedid; Leonardo V Winkelmann; Tomaz J M Grezzana Filho; Cleber D P Kruel
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

4.  The First Decade of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: Costs and Outcomes Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Thuy B Tran; Monica M Dua; David J Worhunsky; George A Poultsides; Jeffrey A Norton; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Physician network position and patient outcomes following implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Erika L Moen; Julie P Bynum; Jonathan S Skinner; Alistair J O'Malley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Pancreas: Reconstruction methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rosalie A Carr; Catherine W Chung; Christian M Schmidt; Andrea Jester; Molly E Kilbane; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at Low-Volume Centre in Tier-II City of India.

Authors:  Kumar Vinchurkar; Vishwanath M Pattanshetti; Manoj Togale; Santosh Hazare; Varadraj Gokak
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-06

9.  Lessons learned from 300 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies over a 25-year experience: the "safety net" improves the outcomes beyond surgeon skills.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Pasquale Lepiane; Giovanni Vennarecci; Gianluca Mascianà; Marco Colasanti; Eugenio Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Time trends in the treatment and prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer in a large tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Giuliano Barugola; Stefano Partelli; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Nora Sartori; Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.