Literature DB >> 31995683

Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.

Harry J de Koning1, Carlijn M van der Aalst1, Pim A de Jong1, Ernst T Scholten1, Kristiaan Nackaerts1, Marjolein A Heuvelmans1, Jan-Willem J Lammers1, Carla Weenink1, Uraujh Yousaf-Khan1, Nanda Horeweg1, Susan van 't Westeinde1, Mathias Prokop1, Willem P Mali1, Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein1, Peter M A van Ooijen1, Joachim G J V Aerts1, Michael A den Bakker1, Erik Thunnissen1, Johny Verschakelen1, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart1, Joan E Walter1, Kevin Ten Haaf1, Harry J M Groen1, Matthijs Oudkerk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data from randomized trials regarding whether volume-based, low-dose computed tomographic (CT) screening can reduce lung-cancer mortality among male former and current smokers.
METHODS: A total of 13,195 men (primary analysis) and 2594 women (subgroup analyses) between the ages of 50 and 74 were randomly assigned to undergo CT screening at T0 (baseline), year 1, year 3, and year 5.5 or no screening. We obtained data on cancer diagnosis and the date and cause of death through linkages with national registries in the Netherlands and Belgium, and a review committee confirmed lung cancer as the cause of death when possible. A minimum follow-up of 10 years until December 31, 2015, was completed for all participants.
RESULTS: Among men, the average adherence to CT screening was 90.0%. On average, 9.2% of the screened participants underwent at least one additional CT scan (initially indeterminate). The overall referral rate for suspicious nodules was 2.1%. At 10 years of follow-up, the incidence of lung cancer was 5.58 cases per 1000 person-years in the screening group and 4.91 cases per 1000 person-years in the control group; lung-cancer mortality was 2.50 deaths per 1000 person-years and 3.30 deaths per 1000 person-years, respectively. The cumulative rate ratio for death from lung cancer at 10 years was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.94; P = 0.01) in the screening group as compared with the control group, similar to the values at years 8 and 9. Among women, the rate ratio was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.38 to 1.14) at 10 years of follow-up, with values of 0.41 to 0.52 in years 7 through 9.
CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving high-risk persons, lung-cancer mortality was significantly lower among those who underwent volume CT screening than among those who underwent no screening. There were low rates of follow-up procedures for results suggestive of lung cancer. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization of Health Research and Development and others; NELSON Netherlands Trial Register number, NL580.).
Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31995683     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  419 in total

1.  A Viral Exposure Signature Defines Early Onset of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinping Liu; Wei Tang; Anuradha Budhu; Marshonna Forgues; Maria O Hernandez; Julián Candia; Yujin Kim; Elise D Bowman; Stefan Ambs; Yongmei Zhao; Bao Tran; Xiaolin Wu; Christopher Koh; Pallavi Surana; T Jake Liang; Maria Guarnera; Dean Mann; Manoj Rajaure; Tim F Greten; Zhanwei Wang; Herbert Yu; Xin Wei Wang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Pianpian Cao; Jihyoun Jeon; David T Levy; Jinani C Jayasekera; Christopher J Cadham; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathryn L Taylor; Rafael Meza
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Clinical perspectives for the use of total body PET/CT.

Authors:  Ronan Abgral; David Bourhis; Pierre-Yves Salaun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Lung Cancer Screening with Chest CT: Efficacy Confirmed.

Authors:  Tina D Tailor; Edward F Patz
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Establishing a Cohort and a Biorepository to Identify Biomarkers for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: The Nashville Lung Cancer Screening Trial Cohort.

Authors:  Dhairya A Lakhani; Sheau-Chiann Chen; Sanja Antic; Anel Muterspaugh; Christine Cook; Nancy Liu; Hina Shujat; Sophie Jouan; Brandon Winston; Kim Fields; Janelle Wenstrup; Sara L Block; Amy Hinton; Alexandra Miller; Sarah Atmajoana; John T Helton; Khushbu Patel; Aneri B Balar; Katrina Brewer; Subodh Nag; Rajbir Singh; Anthony Disher; Luis Huerta; Richard Fremont; Otis Rickman; Heidi Chen; Rosana Eisenberg; Kim L Sandler; Alexis Paulson; Ronald C Walker; Chirayu Shah; Gary T Smith; Bennett Landman; Stephen Deppen; Eric L Grogan; Melinda C Aldrich; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-07

Review 6.  Cancer-Specific Mortality, All-Cause Mortality, and Overdiagnosis in Lung Cancer Screening Trials: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Michelle Bentivegna; Cassie Hulme
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Overdiagnosis in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Matthew E J Callister; Peter Sasieni; Hilary A Robbins
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 30.700

8.  Both Duration and Pack-Years of Tobacco Smoking Should Be Used for Clinical Practice and Research.

Authors:  Roy A Pleasants; M Patricia Rivera; Stephen L Tilley; Surya P Bhatt
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-07

9.  Non-calcified pulmonary nodules detected in low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs can be potential precursors of malignancy.

Authors:  Robert Dziedzic; Witold Rzyman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-05

10.  Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Implementation in Primary Care: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; John M Wilkinson; Neil Korsen; David E Midthun
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.