Literature DB >> 28615408

Examining screening mammography participation among women aged 40 to 74.

Karena D Volesky1, Paul J Villeneuve2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine participation in screening mammography among women aged 40 to 74 and identify which factors are associated with those women who participate in screening.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the cross-sectional 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey.
SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A population-based national sample of 18 312 women aged 40 to 74. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's participation in screening mammography in the 2 years preceding the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey; women's preventive health activities (ie, having a regular doctor, a recent physical checkup, and a Papanicolaou test), which were adjusted for sociodemographic factors.
RESULTS: Participation in recent screening mammography was highest among women aged 60 to 69 (70.3%), followed by those aged 50 to 59 (63.4%) and those aged 70 to 74 (58.4%). Almost one-third (31.4%) of women aged 40 to 49 had had a screening mammogram in the past 2 years. Having a regular doctor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.30, 95% CI 2.90 to 3.73), a physical checkup in the past year (OR = 3.06, 95% CI 2.30 to 4.08), or a Pap test in the past 3 years (OR = 3.47, 95% CI 3.18 to 3.79) more than tripled the odds that women had had a recent screening mammogram.
CONCLUSION: Aside from age being a factor associated with women's participation in screening mammography, factors related to women's health care use (having a regular doctor, a recent physical checkup, and a recent Pap test) demonstrated a stronger association with women aged 40 to 74 having had recent mammograms. The association between women's participation in screening and their preventive health activities implies that the doctor's office is an appropriate venue for conversations regarding the potential benefits and harms of screening mammography. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28615408      PMCID: PMC5471096     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  14 in total

1.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics.

Authors:  K McPherson; C M Steel; J M Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-09

3.  Individual and regional determinants of mammography uptake.

Authors:  Anita R Kothari; Stephen Birch
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

4.  Accumulating evidence on passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Mammography utilization in Canadian women aged 50 to 69: identification of factors that predict initiation and adherence.

Authors:  Christina M Bancej; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Michael Eliasziw
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

6.  An update on mammography use in Canada.

Authors:  Margot Shields; Kathryn Wilkins
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.796

7.  Mammography screening: truth, lies, and controversy.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Priorities for the primary prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Kari Bohlke
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Jutta Mata; Ronald Frank
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinician Variation in Ordering and Completion of Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Medical System.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Olivia Dorsey; Chul Ahn; Jessica L Phillips; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Cristhiaan D Ochoa; Joyce Adesina; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Eric Steen; Harris Majeed; Amrit Gonugunta; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.840

2.  Assessing and Explaining Geographic Variations in Mammography Screening Participation and Breast Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Jonas Czwikla; Iris Urbschat; Joachim Kieschke; Frank Schüssler; Ingo Langner; Falk Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.