Kelly Drelles1, Robert Pilarski1, Kandamurugu Manickam2,3, Abigail B Shoben4, Amanda Ewart Toland5,6. 1. Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 4. College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 5. Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, amanda.toland@osumc.edu. 6. Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Compehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, amanda.toland@osumc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can be useful for providing information about a patient's drug response by increasing drug efficacy and decreasing the incidence of adverse drug events. While PGx tests were previously only offered to patients under healthcare provider supervision, they are now available as direct to consumer (DTC) tests. This study aimed to assess how accurately individuals from the general population were able to interpret a sample PGx test report and if accuracy differed based on individuals' numeracy or prior genetic counseling (GC). METHODS: We surveyed 293 individuals from the general population, ascertained through ResearchMatch. The survey included questions about PGx test interpretation, numeracy, and genetic literacy. RESULTS: In our cohort, numeracy level impacted PGx result interpretation, with those of high numeracy performing statistically significantly better on both the table format and graphical format (p value = 0.002 and p value <0.001, respectively) and genetic knowledge questions (p value <0.001) than those with low/average numeracy. In addition, previous GC did not impact test interpretation or genetic knowledge, but the number of individuals with prior GC was small (n = 26). DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: We found that numeracy had a significant impact on correct interpretation of PGx test reports. Because many individuals in the USA have low numeracy levels, it is extremely important that patients do not make their own medication management decision based on the test results and that they consult with their physicians about their PGx testing. The importance of consultation and discussion with providers about results should be emphasized on the test report.
INTRODUCTION: Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can be useful for providing information about a patient's drug response by increasing drug efficacy and decreasing the incidence of adverse drug events. While PGx tests were previously only offered to patients under healthcare provider supervision, they are now available as direct to consumer (DTC) tests. This study aimed to assess how accurately individuals from the general population were able to interpret a sample PGx test report and if accuracy differed based on individuals' numeracy or prior genetic counseling (GC). METHODS: We surveyed 293 individuals from the general population, ascertained through ResearchMatch. The survey included questions about PGx test interpretation, numeracy, and genetic literacy. RESULTS: In our cohort, numeracy level impacted PGx result interpretation, with those of high numeracy performing statistically significantly better on both the table format and graphical format (p value = 0.002 and p value <0.001, respectively) and genetic knowledge questions (p value <0.001) than those with low/average numeracy. In addition, previous GC did not impact test interpretation or genetic knowledge, but the number of individuals with prior GC was small (n = 26). DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: We found that numeracy had a significant impact on correct interpretation of PGx test reports. Because many individuals in the USA have low numeracy levels, it is extremely important that patients do not make their own medication management decision based on the test results and that they consult with their physicians about their PGx testing. The importance of consultation and discussion with providers about results should be emphasized on the test report.
Authors: S M Fitzgerald-Butt; A Bodine; K M Fry; J Ash; A N Zaidi; V Garg; C A Gerhardt; K L McBride Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Leah R Abrams; Laura M Koehly; Gillian W Hooker; Ryan S Paquin; Joseph N Capella; Colleen M McBride Journal: Public Health Genomics Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Jasmine A Luzum; Natasha Petry; Annette K Taylor; Sara L Van Driest; Henry M Dunnenberger; Larisa H Cavallari Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 6.903