Literature DB >> 29767582

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: where and how does genetic counseling fit?

Anna Middleton1, Álvaro Mendes2, Caroline M Benjamin3,4, Heidi Carmen Howard5.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for disease ranges from well-validated diagnostic and predictive tests to 'research' results conferring increased risks. While being targeted at public curious about their health, they are also marketed for use in reproductive decision-making or management of disease. By virtue of being 'direct-to-consumer' much of this testing bypasses traditional healthcare systems. We argue that direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies should make genetic counseling available, pre- as well as post-test. While we do not advocate that mandatory genetic counseling should gate-keep access to direct-to-consumer genetic testing, if the testing process has the potential to cause psychological distress, then companies have a responsibility to provide support and should not rely on traditional healthcare systems to pick up the pieces. A video abstract is available for this article via this link .

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHIP ME; DTCGT; connecting science; direct-to-consumer; genetic counseling; genetic test; genomics; website

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29767582     DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

1.  Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.

Authors:  Aisling de Paor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Perception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Nicholas Yan Chai Cheung; Jasmine Lee Fong Fung; Yvette Nga Chung Ng; Wilfred Hing Sang Wong; Claudia Ching Yan Chung; Christopher Chun Yu Mak; Brian Hon Yin Chung
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.639

3.  Impact of Previous Genetic Counseling and Objective Numeracy on Accurate Interpretation of a Pharmacogenetics Test Report.

Authors:  Kelly Drelles; Robert Pilarski; Kandamurugu Manickam; Abigail B Shoben; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide.

Authors:  Anna Docherty; Brent Kious; Teneille Brown; Leslie Francis; Louisa Stark; Brooks Keeshin; Jeffrey Botkin; Emily DiBlasi; Doug Gray; Hilary Coon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing's Red Herring: "Genetic Ancestry" and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Mwenza Blell; M A Hunter
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 6.  Current Issues, Challenges, and Future Perspectives of Genetic Counseling in Korea.

Authors:  Namhee Kim; Sun-Young Kong; Jongha Yoo; Do-Hoon Kim; Soo Hyun Seo; Jieun Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  Genetic counselling in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Christine Patch; Anna Middleton
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  Australians' views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study.

Authors:  Jacqueline Savard; Chriselle Hickerton; Rigan Tytherleigh; Bronwyn Terrill; Erin Turbitt; Ainsley J Newson; Brenda Wilson; Kathleen Gray; Clara Gaff; Anna Middleton; Elaine Stackpoole; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Jacqueline Savard; Chriselle Hickerton; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Clara Gaff; Anna Middleton; Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-12-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.