Literature DB >> 27427958

Media Exposure and Genetic Literacy Skills to Evaluate Angelina Jolie's Decision for Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Leah R Abrams1, Laura M Koehly, Gillian W Hooker, Ryan S Paquin, Joseph N Capella, Colleen M McBride.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine public preparedness to evaluate and respond to Angelina Jolie's well-publicized decision to have a prophylactic mastectomy.
METHODS: A consumer panel (n = 1,008) completed an online survey in November 2013, reporting exposure to Jolie's story, confidence applying genomic knowledge to evaluate her decision, and ability to interpret provided genetic risk information (genetic literacy skills). Linear and logistic regressions tested mediating/moderating models of these factors in association with opinions regarding mastectomies.
RESULTS: Confidence with genomics was associated with increased genetic literacy skills and increased media exposure, with a significant interaction between the two. Confidence was also associated with favoring mastectomies for women with BRCA mutations, mediating the relationship with media exposure. Respondents were more likely to form opinions about mastectomies if they had high genetic literacy skills.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that having higher genetic literacy skills may increase the public's ability to form opinions about clinical applications of genomic discovery. However, repeated media exposure to high-profile stories may artificially inflate confidence among those with low genetic literacy.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27427958     DOI: 10.1159/000447944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  5 in total

1.  Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Melinda Krakow; Chelsea L Ratcliff; Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 2.  How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review.

Authors:  Isabella A Sherburn; Keri Finlay; Stephanie Best
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  Impact of Previous Genetic Counseling and Objective Numeracy on Accurate Interpretation of a Pharmacogenetics Test Report.

Authors:  Kelly Drelles; Robert Pilarski; Kandamurugu Manickam; Abigail B Shoben; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale.

Authors:  Michael D Linderman; Sabrina A Suckiel; Nathan Thompson; David J Weiss; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 5.  Mini-Review: Genetic Literacy and Engagement With Genetic Testing for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  India D Little; Chris Gunter
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.