OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and demographic disparities in limited numeracy among emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: We performed two cross-sectional studies of ED patients with sub-critical illness in 2000-2001 and 2006. We enrolled 959 adult patients from 28 EDs in 17 US states and measured numeracy based on four validated questions. RESULTS: Rates of correct responses for individual numeracy questions ranged from 15% to 68%; only 11% of participants answered all questions correctly. Several demographic characteristics were independently associated with frequency of correct answers, including age (OR 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.97] per (upward arrow) 5 years), race/ethnicity (compared to whites: OR 0.35 for blacks [95%CI, 0.20-0.63]; and OR 0.36 for Hispanics [95%CI, 0.19-0.69]), education (OR 4.74 [95%CI, 2.01-11.14] for high school graduates vs. not), health insurance (OR 1.70 [95%CI, 1.06-2.71] for those with private insurance vs. not), and income (OR 1.13 [95%CI, 1.05-1.22] per (upward arrow) $10,000). CONCLUSION: We found a higher prevalence of limited numeracy among ED patients compared to the general population. Significant demographic disparities are consistent with previous observations for general health literacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Greater understanding of the high prevalence of limited numeracy may guide healthcare providers to simplify messages and communicate health information more effectively.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and demographic disparities in limited numeracy among emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: We performed two cross-sectional studies of ED patients with sub-critical illness in 2000-2001 and 2006. We enrolled 959 adult patients from 28 EDs in 17 US states and measured numeracy based on four validated questions. RESULTS: Rates of correct responses for individual numeracy questions ranged from 15% to 68%; only 11% of participants answered all questions correctly. Several demographic characteristics were independently associated with frequency of correct answers, including age (OR 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.97] per (upward arrow) 5 years), race/ethnicity (compared to whites: OR 0.35 for blacks [95%CI, 0.20-0.63]; and OR 0.36 for Hispanics [95%CI, 0.19-0.69]), education (OR 4.74 [95%CI, 2.01-11.14] for high school graduates vs. not), health insurance (OR 1.70 [95%CI, 1.06-2.71] for those with private insurance vs. not), and income (OR 1.13 [95%CI, 1.05-1.22] per (upward arrow) $10,000). CONCLUSION: We found a higher prevalence of limited numeracy among ED patients compared to the general population. Significant demographic disparities are consistent with previous observations for general health literacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Greater understanding of the high prevalence of limited numeracy may guide healthcare providers to simplify messages and communicate health information more effectively.
Authors: Lyndsay A Nelson; Michael T Ackerman; Robert A Greevy; Kenneth A Wallston; Lindsay S Mayberry Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen Journal: Health Expect Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Melody S Goodman; Margaret J Lin; Andrew T Melson; Richard T Griffey Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Candace D McNaughton; Sean P Collins; Sunil Kripalani; Russell Rothman; Wesley H Self; Cathy Jenkins; Karen Miller; Patrick Arbogast; Allen Naftilan; Robert S Dittus; Alan B Storrow Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Andrew T Melson; Margaret J Lin; Christopher R Carpenter; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Richard O White; Chandra Y Osborn; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Ellen Peters; Mary Kate Tompkins; Melissa A Z Knoll; Stacy P Ardoin; Brittany Shoots-Reinhard; Alexa Simon Meara Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 11.205