Angkana Lekagul1,2, Viroj Tangcharoensathien3, Marco Liverani4,5,6, Anne Mills4, Jonathan Rushton7, Shunmay Yeung4. 1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. angkana@ihpp.thaigov.net. 2. International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. angkana@ihpp.thaigov.net. 3. International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. 4. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. 6. Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 7. Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), recognised as a serious and growing threat to global health, is promoted by multiple drivers, including antibiotic use in the livestock sector. Thus, understanding factors influencing antibiotic use in livestock production is essential to the design and implementation of effective interventions to reduce AMR. This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences and views of the key actors associated with the use of antibiotics for pig farming in Thailand, from local farmers to officers in central government institutions. METHODS: A total of 31 in-depth interviews were conducted with different categories of actors: pig farmers (n = 13), drug retailers (n = 5), veterinarians (n = 7), government officers (n = 3) and representatives of animal and human health associations (n = 2). Themes emerging from the interviews were identified and explored using thematic analysis. In addition, direct observations were conducted in the pig farms. RESULTS: The findings highlight the multi-faceted nature of the views and practices that may contribute to misuse or overuse of antibiotics in the study locations, including misconceptions about the nature of antibiotics and AMR (particularly among smallholders), lack of facilities and financial means to establish an antibiotic-free farm, lack of sufficient training on AMR and antibiotic prescribing for veterinarians, the profit motive of pharmaceutical companies and their ties to farm consultants, and lack of sufficient regulatory oversight. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates a clear need to improve antibiotic use for pig production in Thailand. Farmers need better access to veterinary services and reliable information about animal health needs and antibiotics. Innovative investments in biosecurity could improve farm management and decrease reliance on antibiotics, although the cost of these interventions should be low to ensure wide uptake in the livestock sector. Lastly, further development of professional training and clinical guidelines, and the establishment of a code of conduct, would help improve antibiotic dispensing practices.
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), recognised as a serious and growing threat to global health, is promoted by multiple drivers, including antibiotic use in the livestock sector. Thus, understanding factors influencing antibiotic use in livestock production is essential to the design and implementation of effective interventions to reduce AMR. This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences and views of the key actors associated with the use of antibiotics for pig farming in Thailand, from local farmers to officers in central government institutions. METHODS: A total of 31 in-depth interviews were conducted with different categories of actors: pig farmers (n = 13), drug retailers (n = 5), veterinarians (n = 7), government officers (n = 3) and representatives of animal and human health associations (n = 2). Themes emerging from the interviews were identified and explored using thematic analysis. In addition, direct observations were conducted in the pig farms. RESULTS: The findings highlight the multi-faceted nature of the views and practices that may contribute to misuse or overuse of antibiotics in the study locations, including misconceptions about the nature of antibiotics and AMR (particularly among smallholders), lack of facilities and financial means to establish an antibiotic-free farm, lack of sufficient training on AMR and antibiotic prescribing for veterinarians, the profit motive of pharmaceutical companies and their ties to farm consultants, and lack of sufficient regulatory oversight. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates a clear need to improve antibiotic use for pig production in Thailand. Farmers need better access to veterinary services and reliable information about animal health needs and antibiotics. Innovative investments in biosecurity could improve farm management and decrease reliance on antibiotics, although the cost of these interventions should be low to ensure wide uptake in the livestock sector. Lastly, further development of professional training and clinical guidelines, and the establishment of a code of conduct, would help improve antibiotic dispensing practices.
Authors: V H M Visschers; A Backhans; L Collineau; D Iten; S Loesken; M Postma; C Belloc; J Dewulf; U Emanuelson; E Grosse Beilage; M Siegrist; M Sjölund; K D C Stärk Journal: Prev Vet Med Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 2.670
Authors: Bruno Goupil; Frédéric Balusson; Florian Naudet; Maxime Esvan; Benjamin Bastian; Anthony Chapron; Pierre Frouard Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-11-05
Authors: Luís P Carmo; Liza R Nielsen; Lis Alban; Paulo M da Costa; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2018-03-01
Authors: João Pires; Laura Huber; Rachel A Hickman; Simon Dellicour; Kamonwan Lunha; Thongpan Leangapichart; Jatesada Jiwakanon; Ulf Magnusson; Marianne Sunde; Josef D Järhult; Thomas P Van Boeckel Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 4.465
Authors: Lizbeth E Robles-Jimenez; Edgar Aranda-Aguirre; Octavio A Castelan-Ortega; Beatriz S Shettino-Bermudez; Rutilio Ortiz-Salinas; Marta Miranda; Xunde Li; Juan C Angeles-Hernandez; Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez; Manuel Gonzalez-Ronquillo Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 2.752