Literature DB >> 25684036

Perceptions of antimicrobial usage, antimicrobial resistance and policy measures to reduce antimicrobial usage in convenient samples of Belgian, French, German, Swedish and Swiss pig farmers.

V H M Visschers1, A Backhans2, L Collineau3, D Iten4, S Loesken5, M Postma6, C Belloc7, J Dewulf6, U Emanuelson2, E Grosse Beilage5, M Siegrist4, M Sjölund8, K D C Stärk9.   

Abstract

We conducted a survey among convenient samples of pig farmers (N=281) in Belgium, France, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. We identified some significant differences among the five investigated countries (independent variable) regarding farmers' antimicrobial usage compared to their own country and worries related to pig farming (dependent variables), but most of the differences were rather small. In general, farmers perceived their own antimicrobial usage to be lower than that of their peers in the same country and lower than or similar to that of farmers from other countries. This may be a consequence of our convenience sample, resulting in self-selection of highly motivated farmers. Farmers were significantly more worried about financial/legal issues than about antimicrobial resistance. They believed that a reduction in revenues for slaughter pigs treated with a large amount of antimicrobials would have the most impact on reduced antimicrobial usage in their country. Further, farmers who were more worried about antimicrobial resistance and who estimated their own antimicrobial usage as lower than their fellow countrymen, perceived more impact from policy measures on the reduction of antimicrobials. Our results indicated that the same policy measures can be applied to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig farming in all five countries. Moreover, it seems worthwhile to increase pig farmers' awareness of the threat of antimicrobial resistance and its relation to antimicrobial usage; not only because pig farmers appeared little worried about antimicrobial usage but also because it affected farmers' perception of policy measures to reduce antimicrobial usage. Our samples were not representative for the national pig farmer populations. Further research is therefore needed to examine to what extent our findings can be generalised to these populations and to farmers in other countries.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial usage; Perception of policy measures; Pig farmers; Risk perception; Survey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684036     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  25 in total

1.  Application of multiblock modelling to identify key drivers for antimicrobial use in pig production in four European countries.

Authors:  L Collineau; S Bougeard; A Backhans; J Dewulf; U Emanuelson; E Grosse Beilage; A Lehébel; S Lösken; M Postma; M Sjölund; K D C Stärk; V H M Visschers; C Belloc
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.434

2.  Why Antibiotic Use Data in Animals Needs to Be Collected and How This Can Be Facilitated.

Authors:  Jorge Pinto Ferreira
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-12

Review 3.  Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies.

Authors:  Mohamed Rhouma; John Morris Fairbrother; Francis Beaudry; Ann Letellier
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Antimicrobial use in Swedish farrow-to-finish pig herds is related to farmer characteristics.

Authors:  Annette Backhans; Marie Sjölund; Ann Lindberg; Ulf Emanuelson
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-08-01

5.  Evaluation of the relationship between the biosecurity status, production parameters, herd characteristics and antimicrobial usage in farrow-to-finish pig production in four EU countries.

Authors:  Merel Postma; Annette Backhans; Lucie Collineau; Svenja Loesken; Marie Sjölund; Catherine Belloc; Ulf Emanuelson; Elisabeth Grosse Beilage; Elisabeth Okholm Nielsen; Katharina D C Stärk; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-05-01

6.  Coaching Belgian and Dutch Broiler Farmers Aimed at Antimicrobial Stewardship and Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Nele Caekebeke; Moniek Ringenier; Franca J Jonquiere; Tijs J Tobias; Merel Postma; Angelique van den Hoogen; Manon A M Houben; Francisca C Velkers; Nathalie Sleeckx; Arjan Stegeman; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  Understanding the culture of antimicrobial prescribing in agriculture: a qualitative study of UK pig veterinary surgeons.

Authors:  L A Coyne; S M Latham; N J Williams; S Dawson; I J Donald; R B Pearson; R F Smith; G L Pinchbeck
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Learning Processes and Trajectories for the Reduction of Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming: A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Fortané; Florence Bonnet-Beaugrand; Anne Hémonic; Carole Samedi; Arnaud Savy; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-22

9.  Antimicrobial Usage and -Resistance in Livestock: Where Should We Focus?

Authors:  Ioannis Magouras; Luís P Carmo; Katharina D C Stärk; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-15

Review 10.  Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review.

Authors:  Angkana Lekagul; Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Shunmay Yeung
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.