Literature DB >> 23490144

Farmers' attitudes to disease risk management in England: a comparative analysis of sheep and pig farmers.

C J Garforth1, A P Bailey, R B Tranter.   

Abstract

The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) identified practices to reduce the risk of animal disease outbreaks. We report on the response of sheep and pig farmers in England to promotion of these practices. A conceptual framework was established from research on factors influencing adoption of animal health practices, linking knowledge, attitudes, social influences and perceived constraints to the implementation of specific practices. Qualitative data were collected from nine sheep and six pig enterprises in 2011. Thematic analysis explored attitudes and responses to the proposed practices, and factors influencing the likelihood of implementation. Most feel they are doing all they can reasonably do to minimise disease risk and that practices not being implemented are either not relevant or ineffective. There is little awareness and concern about risk from unseen threats. Pig farmers place more emphasis than sheep farmers on controlling wildlife, staff and visitor management and staff training. The main factors that influence livestock farmers' decision on whether or not to implement a specific disease risk measure are: attitudes to, and perceptions of, disease risk; attitudes towards the specific measure and its efficacy; characteristics of the enterprise which they perceive as making a measure impractical; previous experience of a disease or of the measure; and the credibility of information and advice. Great importance is placed on access to authoritative information with most seeing vets as the prime source to interpret generic advice from national bodies in the local context. Uptake of disease risk measures could be increased by: improved risk communication through the farming press and vets to encourage farmers to recognise hidden threats; dissemination of credible early warning information to sharpen farmers' assessment of risk; and targeted information through training events, farming press, vets and other advisers, and farmer groups, tailored to the different categories of livestock farmer.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23490144     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  22 in total

1.  Information needs, sources, and decision-making by hatching egg and broiler chicken producers: A qualitative study in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  R Michele Anholt; Margaret Russell; Tom Inglis; Darko Mitevski; David Hall
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  An analysis of cattle farmers' perceptions of drivers and barriers to on-farm control of Escherichia coli O157.

Authors:  L Toma; J C Low; B Vosough Ahmadi; L Matthews; A W Stott
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Farmers' Intentions to Implement Foot and Mouth Disease Control Measures in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Wudu T Jemberu; M C M Mourits; H Hogeveen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exploring Attitudes and Beliefs towards Implementing Cattle Disease Prevention and Control Measures: A Qualitative Study with Dairy Farmers in Great Britain.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Nick Wright; Wendela Wapenaar; Susanne Jarratt; Pru Hobson-West; Imogen F Richens; Jasmeet Kaler; Heather Buchanan; Jonathan N Huxley; Heather M O'Connor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Pig producer perspectives on the use of meat inspection as an animal health and welfare diagnostic tool in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Catherine Devitt; Laura Boyle; D L Teixeira; N E O'Connell; M Hawe; Alison Hanlon
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.146

6.  Differing perceptions - Swedish farmers' views of infectious disease control.

Authors:  Jenny Frössling; Maria Nöremark
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-11

7.  The intention of North-Western Ethiopian dairy farmers to control mastitis.

Authors:  Sefinew Alemu Mekonnen; Gerrit Koop; Theo J G M Lam; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  On-farm biosecurity as perceived by professionals visiting Swedish farms.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg-Lewerin
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  English Pig Farmers' Knowledge and Behaviour towards African Swine Fever Suspicion and Reporting.

Authors:  Claire Guinat; Ben Wall; Linda Dixon; Dirk Udo Pfeiffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Swedish Farmers' Opinions about Biosecurity and Their Intention to Make Professionals Use Clean Protective Clothing When Entering the Stable.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin; Linda Ernholm; Jenny Frössling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.