Literature DB >> 24068760

The dynamics of sensorimotor calibration in reaching-to-grasp movements.

Geoffrey P Bingham1, Mark A Mon-Williams.   

Abstract

Reach-to-grasp movements require information about the distance and size of target objects. Calibration of this information could be achieved via feedback information (visual and/or haptic) regarding terminal accuracy when target objects are grasped. A number of reports suggest that the nervous system alters reach-to-grasp behavior following either a visual or haptic error signal indicating inaccurate reaching. Nevertheless, the reported modification is generally partial (reaching is changed less than predicted by the feedback error), a finding that has been ascribed to slow adaptation rates. It is possible, however, that the modified reaching reflects the system's weighting of the visual and haptic information in the presence of noise rather than calibration per se. We modeled the dynamics of calibration and showed that the discrepancy between reaching behavior and the feedback error results from an incomplete calibration process. Our results provide evidence for calibration being an intrinsic feature of reach-to-grasp behavior.

Keywords:  calibration; cue combination; dynamics; feedback control; sensorimotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068760      PMCID: PMC3882819          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00112.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bingham; Rachel Coats; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Alignment to natural and imposed mismatches between the senses.

Authors:  K van der Kooij; E Brenner; R J van Beers; W D Schot; J B J Smeets
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Multi-sensory weights depend on contextual noise in reference frame transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Katherine Burns; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The proprioceptive map of the arm is systematic and stable, but idiosyncratic.

Authors:  Liliana Rincon-Gonzalez; Christopher A Buneo; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Authors:  Rachel A Herth; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Olivia Cherry; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.