Literature DB >> 33362495

Motor Deficits in the Ipsilesional Arm of Severely Paretic Stroke Survivors Correlate With Functional Independence in Left, but Not Right Hemisphere Damage.

Shanie A L Jayasinghe1, David Good1, David A Wagstaff2, Carolee Winstein3, Robert L Sainburg1,4.   

Abstract

Chronic stroke survivors with severe contralesional arm paresis face numerous challenges to performing activities of daily living, which largely rely on the use of the less-affected ipsilesional arm. While use of the ipsilesional arm is often encouraged as a compensatory strategy in rehabilitation, substantial evidence indicates that motor control deficits in this arm can be functionally limiting, suggesting a role for remediation of this arm. Previous research has indicated that the nature of ipsilesional motor control deficits vary with hemisphere of damage and with the severity of contralesional paresis. Thus, in order to design rehabilitation that accounts for these deficits in promoting function, it is critical to understand the relative contributions of both ipsilesional and contralesional arm motor deficits to functional independence in stroke survivors with severe contralesional paresis. We now examine motor deficits in each arm of severely paretic chronic stroke survivors with unilateral damage (10 left-, 10 right-hemisphere damaged individuals) to determine whether hemisphere-dependent deficits are correlated with functional independence. Clinical evaluation of contralesional, paretic arm impairment was conducted with the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (UEFM). Ipsilesional arm motor performance was evaluated using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), grip strength, and ipsilesional high-resolution kinematic analysis during a visually targeted reaching task. Functional independence was measured with the Barthel Index. Functional independence was better correlated with ipsilesional than contralesional arm motor performance in the left hemisphere damage group [JTHFT: [r (10) = -0.73, p = 0.017]; grip strength: [r (10) = 0.64, p = 0.047]], and by contralesional arm impairment in the right hemisphere damage group [UEFM: [r (10) = 0.66, p = 0.040]]. Ipsilesional arm kinematics were correlated with functional independence in the left hemisphere damage group only. Examination of hemisphere-dependent motor correlates of functional independence showed that ipsilesional arm deficits were important in determining functional outcomes in individuals with left hemisphere damage only, suggesting that functional independence in right hemisphere damaged participants was affected by other factors.
Copyright © 2020 Jayasinghe, Good, Wagstaff, Winstein and Sainburg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CVA; functional outcome; kinematics; motor deficits; upper extremity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362495      PMCID: PMC7756120          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.599220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  42 in total

1.  Manual reaction time asymmetries in human subjects: the role of movement planning and attention.

Authors:  S Barthelemy; P Boulinguez
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Haaland; Jillian L Prestopnik; Robert T Knight; Roland R Lee
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements.

Authors:  K Y Haaland; D Harrington
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke: kinematic differences based on side of brain damage.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  S M Michaelsen; A Luta; A Roby-Brami; M F Levin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Laterality of Damage Influences the Relationship Between Impairment and Arm Use After Stroke.

Authors:  Goldy Yadav; Kathleen Y Haaland; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements.

Authors:  K Y Haaland; D L Harrington
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Determining Levels of Upper Extremity Movement Impairment by Applying a Cluster Analysis to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Woytowicz; Jeremy C Rietschel; Ronald N Goodman; Susan S Conroy; John D Sorkin; Jill Whitall; Sandy McCombe Waller
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Neural Control of Stopping and Stabilizing the Arm.

Authors:  Shanie A L Jayasinghe; Robert A Scheidt; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21

2.  Object-centered sensorimotor bias of torque control in the chronic stage following stroke.

Authors:  Thomas Rudolf Schneider; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.