Literature DB >> 2923708

The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements.

K Y Haaland1, D Harrington.   

Abstract

The purpose of these experiments was to determine if the two hemispheres play different roles in controlling closed loop movements. Subjects were asked to move to a narrow or wide target in the left or right hemispace. Reaction time (RT) was faster for the left arm of normals, only in the right hemispace, but there were no differences between arms in movement execution. Right but not left hemisphere stroke (CVA) patients showed longer RTs for the contralateral but not ipsilateral arm. The right CVA group's ipsilateral movement, especially to narrow targets was less accurate. The left CVA group's RT did not benefit from advanced information, but ipsilateral movement execution was normal. These results were discussed in terms of inter- as well as intrahemispheric control of programming and execution of closed loop movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2923708     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90027-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  21 in total

1.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Position sense asymmetry.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Symmetry, broken symmetry, and handedness in bimanual coordination dynamics.

Authors:  P J Treffner; M T Turvey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Functional Deficits in the Less-Impaired Arm of Stroke Survivors Depend on Hemisphere of Damage and Extent of Paretic Arm Impairment.

Authors:  Candice Maenza; David C Good; Carolee J Winstein; David A Wagstaff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Arm dominance affects feedforward strategy more than feedback sensitivity during a postural task.

Authors:  Elise H E Walker; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms.

Authors:  Saandeep Mani; Pratik K Mutha; Andrzej Przybyla; Kathleen Y Haaland; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.