Literature DB >> 2771034

Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements.

K Y Haaland1, D L Harrington.   

Abstract

This study examined whether the left and right hemispheres play differential roles in controlling the initial and corrective components of aiming movements. A simple aiming task was administered to 31 normal control subjects and 29 unilateral stroke patients (14 with right hemisphere damage and 15 with left hemisphere damage). Movement amplitude was varied (25, 64 and 100 mm) and reaction time, movement time and accuracy were measured. Through a trajectory analysis, initial and corrective movements were separated. The stroke patients performed the task with their ipsilateral arm which was compared to the normal controls' right or left are performance. Regardless of the movement amplitude the left hemisphere group's reaction time was slower, and the execution of the initial movement component was less accurate than controls. No performance deficits were found on corrective movements. Performance was not impaired for the right hemisphere group on any measures. These results are discussed in terms of the hemispheres' possible roles in controlling movements which are largely open or closed loop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2771034     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90071-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  43 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage.

Authors:  Danilo Y Esparza; Philippe S Archambault; Carolee J Winstein; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Position sense asymmetry.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer; Vivek Yadav
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Left hand, but not right hand, reaching is sensitive to visual context.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Rick Müskens; Susan Hoonhorst; Jay Pratt; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Haaland; Sydney Y Schaefer; Robert T Knight; John Adair; Alvaro Magalhaes; Joseph Sadek; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.