Literature DB >> 15033898

Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching.

Kathleen Y Haaland1, Jillian L Prestopnik, Robert T Knight, Roland R Lee.   

Abstract

Kinematic analyses of reaching have suggested that the left hemisphere is dominant for controlling the open loop component of the movement, which is more dependent on motor programmes; and the right hemisphere is dominant for controlling the closed loop component, which is more dependent on sensory feedback. This open and closed loop hypothesis of hemispheric asymmetry would also predict that advance planning should be dependent on the left hemisphere, and on-line response modification, which defines closed loop processes, should be dependent on the right hemisphere. Using kinematic analyses of reaching in patients with left or right hemisphere damage (LHD or RHD), we examined the ability: (i) to plan reaching movements in advance by examining changes in reaction time (RT) when response amplitude and visual feedback were cued prior to the response; and (ii) to modify the response during implementation when target location changed at the RT. Performance was compared between the stroke groups, using the ipsilesional arm, and age-matched control groups using their right (RNC) or left (LNC) arm. Aiming movements to a target that moved once or twice, with the second step occurring at the RT, were performed with or without visual feedback of hand position. There were no deficits in advance planning in either stroke group, as evidenced by comparable group changes in RT with changes in amplitude and visual feedback. Response modification deficits were seen for the LHD group in secondary velocity only. In addition, LHD produced slower initial peak velocity with prolongation of the deceleration phase and faster secondary peak velocities, and the RHD group produced deficits in final error only. These differences are more consistent with the dynamic dominance hypothesis, which links left hemisphere specialization to movement trajectory control and right hemisphere specialization to position control, rather than to global deficits in open and closed loop processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15033898     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  68 in total

1.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Gil Rivlis; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Asymmetric interference in left-handers during bimanual movements reflects switch in lateralized control characteristics.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hand dominance and multi-finger synergies.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Robert L Sainburg; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Johanna V G Robertson; Thomas Hoellinger; Påvel Lindberg; Djamel Bensmail; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Bilateral impairments in task-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; James M Finley; Jonathan B Shemmell; Claire F Honeycutt; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  New hypotheses about postural control support the notion that all dystonias are manifestations of excessive brain postural function.

Authors:  Anne J Blood
Journal:  Biosci Hypotheses       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.