Literature DB >> 11711210

Manual reaction time asymmetries in human subjects: the role of movement planning and attention.

S Barthelemy1, P Boulinguez.   

Abstract

Hemispheric asymmetries in spatial processing are generally considered to be responsible for the shorter reaction time (RT) of the left hand classically observed for right-handers when pointing at targets. Surprisingly, despite the special role which the right cerebral hemisphere is known to play in visual attention, the attentional hypothesis for hand movement preparation asymmetries is currently rejected. This study aims to test the respective roles of visual attention and movement planning in the left hand RT advantage for goal-directed movements. Two experiments were conducted with the same subjects, a simple visual detection task and a classical pointing task, using the same lateralized stimuli. Subjects used the left hand and the right hand alternatively in order to react to the stimuli. In the detection task, the reaction consisted of simply releasing a switch as quickly as possible after the appearance of a target, whereas in the pointing task, it consisted of performing lateralized reaching movements towards the same target. The main results of this study revealed left hand shorter RTs for both tasks, emphasizing the role which right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial attention plays in manual aiming asymmetries. Moreover, a direct comparison of the RTs obtained in both experiments showed that the specific cost of movement planning was lower when using the left hand, therefore also revealing right hemisphere dominance for movement planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11711210     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02313-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  19 in total

1.  Time-dependent hemispheric shift of the cortical control of volitional swallowing.

Authors:  Inga K Teismann; Rainer Dziewas; Olaf Steinstraeter; Christo Pantev
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Hemifield or hemispace: what accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?

Authors:  David P Carey; Jonathan Liddle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Movement structure in young and elderly adults during goal-directed movements of the left and right arm.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Beth Barduson; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Heidi Long; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Harris; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Two agents in the brain: motor control of unimanual and bimanual reaching movements.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai; Eriko Sugimori; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Complex tasks force hand laterality and technological behaviour in naturalistically housed chimpanzees: inferences in hominin evolution.

Authors:  M Mosquera; N Geribàs; A Bargalló; M Llorente; D Riba
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

9.  Processing of hand-related verbs specifically affects the planning and execution of arm reaching movements.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Sara Iaconelli; Silvia Spadacenta; Paolo Federico; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two separate, large cohorts reveal potential modifiers of age-associated variation in visual reaction time performance.

Authors:  J S Talboom; M D De Both; M A Naymik; A M Schmidt; C R Lewis; W M Jepsen; A K Håberg; T Rundek; B E Levin; S Hoscheidt; Y Bolla; R D Brinton; N J Schork; M Hay; C A Barnes; E Glisky; L Ryan; M J Huentelman
Journal:  NPJ Aging Mech Dis       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.