Literature DB >> 33348373

Maintenance of Tight Junction Integrity in the Absence of Vascular Dilation in the Brain of Mice Exposed to Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation.

Barrett D Allen1, Munjal M Acharya1, Pierre Montay-Gruel2, Patrik Goncalves Jorge2,3, Claude Bailat3, Benoît Petit2, Marie-Catherine Vozenin2, Charles Limoli1.   

Abstract

Persistent vasculature abnormalities contribute to an altered CNS microenvironment that further compromises the integrity of the blood-brain barrier and exposes the brain to a host of neurotoxic conditions. Standard radiation therapy at conventional (CONV) dose rate elicits short-term damage to the blood-brain barrier by disrupting supportive cells, vasculature volume and tight junction proteins. While current clinical applications of cranial radiotherapy use dose fractionation to reduce normal tissue damage, these treatments still cause significant complications. While dose escalation enhances treatment of radiation-resistant tumors, methods to subvert normal tissue damage are clearly needed. In this regard, we have recently developed a new modality of irradiation based on the use of ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH that does not induce the classical pathogenic patterns caused by CONV irradiation. In previous work, we optimized the physical parameters required to minimize normal brain toxicity (i.e., FLASH, instantaneous intra-pulse dose rate, 6.9 · 106 Gy/s, at a mean dose rate of 2,500 Gy/s), which we then used in the current study to determine the effect of FLASH on the integrity of the vasculature and the blood-brain barrier. Both early (24 h, one week) and late (one month) timepoints postirradiation were investigated using C57Bl/6J female mice exposed to whole-brain irradiation delivered in single doses of 25 Gy and 10 Gy, respectively, using CONV (0.09 Gy/s) or FLASH (>106 Gy/s). While the majority of changes found one day postirradiation were minimal, FLASH was found to reduce levels of apoptosis in the neurogenic regions of the brain at this time. At one week and one month postirradiation, CONV was found to induce vascular dilation, a well described sign of vascular alteration, while FLASH minimized these effects. These results were positively correlated with and temporally coincident to changes in the immunostaining of the vasodilator eNOS colocalized to the vasculature, suggestive of possible dysregulation in blood flow at these latter times. Overall expression of the tight junction proteins, occludin and claudin-5, which was significantly reduced after CONV irradiation, remained unchanged in the FLASH-irradiated brains at one and four weeks postirradiation. Our data further confirm that, compared to isodoses of CONV irradiation known to elicit detrimental effects, FLASH does not damage the normal vasculature. These data now provide the first evidence that FLASH preserves microvasculature integrity in the brain, which may prove beneficial to cognition while allowing for better tumor control in the clinic. ©2020 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33348373      PMCID: PMC7773228          DOI: 10.1667/RADE-20-00060.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  51 in total

1.  Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Kristoffer Petersson; Leila Alikhani; Chakradhar Yakkala; Barrett D Allen; Jonathan Ollivier; Benoit Petit; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Amber R Syage; Thuan A Nguyen; Al Anoud D Baddour; Celine Lu; Paramvir Singh; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Jean-François Germond; Pascal Froidevaux; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry - A model to correct for the ion recombination in the Advanced Markus ionization chamber.

Authors:  Kristoffer Petersson; Maud Jaccard; Jean-François Germond; Thierry Buchillier; François Bochud; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Claudins and the modulation of tight junction permeability.

Authors:  Dorothee Günzel; Alan S L Yu
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry: Commissioning of the Oriatron eRT6 prototype linear accelerator for preclinical use.

Authors:  Maud Jaccard; Maria Teresa Durán; Kristoffer Petersson; Jean-François Germond; Philippe Liger; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Jean Bourhis; François Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Activation of eNOS in endothelial cells exposed to ionizing radiation involves components of the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  Masaki Nagane; Hironobu Yasui; Yuri Sakai; Tohru Yamamori; Koichi Niwa; Yuichi Hattori; Takashi Kondo; Osamu Inanami
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Radiation-induced changes in normal-appearing white matter in patients with cerebral tumors: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Vijaya Nagesh; Christina I Tsien; Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junick; Yue Cao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Intellectual functioning and multi-dimensional attentional processes in long-term survivors of a central nervous system related pediatric malignancy.

Authors:  Robert W Butler; Diane L Fairclough; Ernest R Katz; Anne E Kazak; Robert B Noll; Ryan D Thompson; Olle Jane Z Sahler
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  FLASH Irradiation Spares Lung Progenitor Cells and Limits the Incidence of Radio-induced Senescence.

Authors:  Sandra Curras-Alonso; Lorena Giuranno; Charles Fouillade; Eddy Quelennec; Sophie Heinrich; Sarah Bonnet-Boissinot; Arnaud Beddok; Sophie Leboucher; Hamza Umut Karakurt; Mylène Bohec; Sylvain Baulande; Marc Vooijs; Pierre Verrelle; Marie Dutreix; Arturo Londoño-Vallejo; Vincent Favaudon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Longitudinal assessment of late-onset neurologic conditions in survivors of childhood central nervous system tumors: a Childhood Cancer Survivor Study report.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Wells; Nicole J Ullrich; Kristy Seidel; Wendy Leisenring; Charles A Sklar; Gregory T Armstrong; Lisa Diller; Allison King; Kevin R Krull; Joseph P Neglia; Marilyn Stovall; Kimberly Whelan; Kevin C Oeffinger; Leslie L Robison; Roger J Packer
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Stroke among cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Ying Zhang; Leila T Tchelebi; Heath B Mackley; Vernon M Chinchilli; Brad E Zacharia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Munjal Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Billy W Loo; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Ultra-high dose rate radiation production and delivery systems intended for FLASH.

Authors:  Jonathan Farr; Veljko Grilj; Victor Malka; Srinivasan Sudharsan; Marco Schippers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 3.  Breaking barriers: Neurodegenerative repercussions of radiotherapy induced damage on the blood-brain and blood-tumor barrier.

Authors:  Barrett D Allen; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Charles L Limoli; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Benoît Petit; Ioannis G Petridis; Philippe Fuchs; Ron Leavitt; Kristoffer Petersson; Maude Gondré; Jonathan Ollivier; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Jean-François Germond
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 13.801

5.  Comparable Long-Term Tumor Control for Hypofractionated FLASH Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in an Immunocompetent Rat Glioma Model.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Emma Liljedahl; Emma Gustafsson; Gabriel Adrian; Sarah Beyer; Suhayb Ehsaan Ilaahi; Kristoffer Petersson; Crister Ceberg; Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-02

Review 6.  Mechanisms of FLASH effect.

Authors:  Binwei Lin; Dan Huang; Feng Gao; Yiwei Yang; Dai Wu; Yu Zhang; Gang Feng; Tangzhi Dai; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Multiple Irradiation Affects Cellular and Extracellular Components of the Mouse Brain Tissue and Adhesion and Proliferation of Glioblastoma Cells in Experimental System In Vivo.

Authors:  Maxim O Politko; Alexandra Y Tsidulko; Oxana A Pashkovskaya; Konstantin E Kuper; Anastasia V Suhovskih; Galina M Kazanskaya; Lyubov S Klyushova; Dmitry K Sokolov; Alexander M Volkov; Evgenii E Kliver; Alexander A Zheravin; Svetlana V Aidagulova; Elvira V Grigorieva
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.