Literature DB >> 33060122

Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice.

Pierre Montay-Gruel1, Munjal M Acharya2, Charles L Limoli2, Marie-Catherine Vozenin3, Patrik Gonçalves Jorge1,4, Benoît Petit1, Ioannis G Petridis1, Philippe Fuchs1, Ron Leavitt1, Kristoffer Petersson1,4, Maude Gondré1,4, Jonathan Ollivier1, Raphael Moeckli4, François Bochud4, Claude Bailat4, Jean Bourhis1, Jean-François Germond4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent data have shown that single-fraction irradiation delivered to the whole brain in less than tenths of a second using FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), does not elicit neurocognitive deficits in mice. This observation has important clinical implications for the management of invasive and treatment-resistant brain tumors that involves relatively large irradiation volumes with high cytotoxic doses. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Therefore, we aimed at simultaneously investigating the antitumor efficacy and neuroprotective benefits of FLASH-RT 1-month after exposure, using a well-characterized murine orthotopic glioblastoma model. As fractionated regimens of radiotherapy are the standard of care for glioblastoma treatment, we incorporated dose fractionation to simultaneously validate the neuroprotective effects and optimized tumor treatments with FLASH-RT.
RESULTS: The capability of FLASH-RT to minimize the induction of radiation-induced brain toxicities has been attributed to the reduction of reactive oxygen species, casting some concern that this might translate to a possible loss of antitumor efficacy. Our study shows that FLASH and CONV-RT are isoefficient in delaying glioblastoma growth for all tested regimens. Furthermore, only FLASH-RT was found to significantly spare radiation-induced cognitive deficits in learning and memory in tumor-bearing animals after the delivery of large neurotoxic single dose or hypofractionated regimens.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that FLASH-RT delivered with hypofractionated regimens is able to spare the normal brain from radiation-induced toxicities without compromising tumor cure. This exciting capability provides an initial framework for future clinical applications of FLASH-RT.See related commentary by Huang and Mendonca, p. 662. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33060122      PMCID: PMC7854480          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  40 in total

1.  Radiobiology. Effect of high dose rates on survival of mammalian cells.

Authors:  C D Town
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Radiobiological response to ultra-short pulsed megavoltage electron beams of ultra-high pulse dose rate.

Authors:  Elke Beyreuther; Leonhard Karsch; Lydia Laschinsky; Elisabeth Leßmann; Doreen Naumburger; Melanie Oppelt; Christian Richter; Michael Schürer; Julia Woithe; Jörg Pawelke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Kristoffer Petersson; Leila Alikhani; Chakradhar Yakkala; Barrett D Allen; Jonathan Ollivier; Benoit Petit; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Amber R Syage; Thuan A Nguyen; Al Anoud D Baddour; Celine Lu; Paramvir Singh; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Jean-François Germond; Pascal Froidevaux; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry: Usability and dose-rate independence of EBT3 Gafchromic films.

Authors:  Maud Jaccard; Kristoffer Petersson; Thierry Buchillier; Jean-François Germond; Maria Teresa Durán; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Jean Bourhis; François O Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Experimental Platform for Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Irradiation of Small Animals Using a Clinical Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Stefania Trovati; Gregory King; Frederick Lartey; Marjan Rafat; Manuel Villegas; A Joe Praxel; Billy W Loo; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Effects of pulses of radiation on the survival of mammalian cells.

Authors:  A H Nias; A J Swallow; J P Keene; B W Hodgson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry: Commissioning of the Oriatron eRT6 prototype linear accelerator for preclinical use.

Authors:  Maud Jaccard; Maria Teresa Durán; Kristoffer Petersson; Jean-François Germond; Philippe Liger; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Jean Bourhis; François Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The Advantage of FLASH Radiotherapy Confirmed in Mini-pig and Cat-cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Pauline De Fornel; Kristoffer Petersson; Patrick Devauchelle; Jean Bourhis; Vincent Favaudon; Maud Jaccard; Jean-François Germond; Benoit Petit; Marco Burki; Gisèle Ferrand; David Patin; Hanan Bouchaab; Mahmut Ozsahin; François Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Predicting major depression in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  David K Wellisch; Thomas A Kaleita; Donald Freeman; Timothy Cloughesy; Jeffrey Goldman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Pathogenetic mechanisms in radiation fibrosis.

Authors:  John Yarnold; Marie-Catherine Vozenin Brotons
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Neurological side effects of radiation therapy.

Authors:  J Jacob; L Feuvret; J-M Simon; M Ribeiro; L Nichelli; C Jenny; D Ricard; D Psimaras; K Hoang-Xuan; P Maingon
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Rudi Labarbe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Shining a FLASHlight on Ultrahigh Dose-Rate Radiation and Possible Late Toxicity.

Authors:  Amit Maity; Constantinos Koumenis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 4.  All for one, though not one for all: team players in normal tissue radiobiology.

Authors:  Marjan Boerma; Catherine M Davis; Isabel L Jackson; Dörthe Schaue; Jacqueline P Williams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 5.  The importance of hypoxia in radiotherapy for the immune response, metastatic potential and FLASH-RT.

Authors:  Eui Jung Moon; Kristoffer Petersson; Monica M Olcina
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Letter in Response to Doyen et al., "Early Toxicities After High Dose Rate Proton Therapy in Cancer Treatments".

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Immune radiobiology.

Authors:  Claire Vanpouille-Box
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Establishment and Initial Experience of Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy in Canine Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Maja L Arendt; Kristine Bastholm Jensen; Betina Børresen; Anders E Hansen; Sven Bäck; Annemarie T Kristensen; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Crister Ceberg; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Exploiting Radiation Therapy to Restore Immune Reactivity of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mara De Martino; Oscar Padilla; Camille Daviaud; Cheng-Chia Wu; Robyn D Gartrell; Claire Vanpouille-Box
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Radiation-Induced Immunity and Toxicities: The Versatility of the cGAS-STING Pathway.

Authors:  Julie Constanzo; Julien Faget; Chiara Ursino; Christophe Badie; Jean-Pierre Pouget
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.