Literature DB >> 31796518

FLASH Irradiation Spares Lung Progenitor Cells and Limits the Incidence of Radio-induced Senescence.

Sandra Curras-Alonso1,2, Lorena Giuranno3, Charles Fouillade4, Eddy Quelennec1, Sophie Heinrich1,5, Sarah Bonnet-Boissinot1, Arnaud Beddok1, Sophie Leboucher6, Hamza Umut Karakurt2, Mylène Bohec7, Sylvain Baulande7, Marc Vooijs3, Pierre Verrelle8,9, Marie Dutreix1, Arturo Londoño-Vallejo2, Vincent Favaudon4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: One of the main limitations to anticancer radiotherapy lies in irreversible damage to healthy tissues located within the radiation field. "FLASH" irradiation at very high dose-rate is a new treatment modality that has been reported to specifically spare normal tissue from late radiation-induced toxicity in animal models and therefore could be a promising strategy to reduce treatment toxicity. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Lung responses to FLASH irradiation were investigated by qPCR, single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNA-Seq), and histologic methods during the acute wound healing phase as well as at late stages using C57BL/6J wild-type and Terc-/- mice exposed to bilateral thorax irradiation as well as human lung cells grown in vitro.
RESULTS: In vitro studies gave evidence of a reduced level of DNA damage and induced lethality at the advantage of FLASH. In mouse lung, sc-RNA-seq and the monitoring of proliferating cells revealed that FLASH minimized the induction of proinflammatory genes and reduced the proliferation of progenitor cells after injury. At late stages, FLASH-irradiated lungs presented less persistent DNA damage and senescent cells than after CONV exposure, suggesting a higher potential for lung regeneration with FLASH. Consistent with this hypothesis, the beneficial effect of FLASH was lost in Terc-/- mice harboring critically short telomeres and lack of telomerase activity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, compared with conventional radiotherapy, FLASH minimizes DNA damage in normal cells, spares lung progenitor cells from excessive damage, and reduces the risk of replicative senescence. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31796518     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

1.  Maintenance of Tight Junction Integrity in the Absence of Vascular Dilation in the Brain of Mice Exposed to Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation.

Authors:  Barrett D Allen; Munjal M Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Claude Bailat; Benoît Petit; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles Limoli
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Rudi Labarbe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Munjal Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Billy W Loo; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 4.  The importance of hypoxia in radiotherapy for the immune response, metastatic potential and FLASH-RT.

Authors:  Eui Jung Moon; Kristoffer Petersson; Monica M Olcina
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  DNA strand break induction of aqueous plasmid DNA exposed to 30 MeV protons at ultra-high dose rate.

Authors:  Daisuke Ohsawa; Yota Hiroyama; Alisa Kobayashi; Tamon Kusumoto; Hisashi Kitamura; Satoru Hojo; Satoshi Kodaira; Teruaki Konishi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  SDDRO-joint: simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization with the joint use of transmission beams and Bragg peaks for FLASH proton therapy.

Authors:  Yuting Lin; Bowen Lin; Shujun Fu; Michael M Folkerts; Eric Abel; Jeffrey Bradley; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Quantification of Oxygen Depletion During FLASH Irradiation In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Xu Cao; Rongxiao Zhang; Tatiana V Esipova; Srinivasa Rao Allu; Ramish Ashraf; Mahbubur Rahman; Jason R Gunn; Petr Bruza; David J Gladstone; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz; P Jack Hoopes; Sergei A Vinogradov; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 8.013

Review 8.  Biology of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury.

Authors:  Soumyajit Roy; Kilian E Salerno; Deborah E Citrin
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Establishment and Initial Experience of Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy in Canine Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Maja L Arendt; Kristine Bastholm Jensen; Betina Børresen; Anders E Hansen; Sven Bäck; Annemarie T Kristensen; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Crister Ceberg; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  FLASH Proton Radiotherapy Spares Normal Epithelial and Mesenchymal Tissues While Preserving Sarcoma Response.

Authors:  Keith A Cengel; Amit Maity; Theresa M Busch; Anastasia Velalopoulou; Ilias V Karagounis; Gwendolyn M Cramer; Michele M Kim; Giorgos Skoufos; Denisa Goia; Sarah Hagan; Ioannis I Verginadis; Khayrullo Shoniyozov; June Chiango; Michelle Cerullo; Kelley Varner; Lutian Yao; Ling Qin; Artemis G Hatzigeorgiou; Andy J Minn; Mary Putt; Matthew Lanza; Charles-Antoine Assenmacher; Enrico Radaelli; Jennifer Huck; Eric Diffenderfer; Lei Dong; James Metz; Constantinos Koumenis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 13.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.