Literature DB >> 28094853

High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry - A model to correct for the ion recombination in the Advanced Markus ionization chamber.

Kristoffer Petersson1, Maud Jaccard1, Jean-François Germond1, Thierry Buchillier1, François Bochud1, Jean Bourhis2, Marie-Catherine Vozenin2, Claude Bailat1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to establish an empirical model of the ion recombination in the Advanced Markus ionization chamber for measurements in high dose rate/dose-per-pulse electron beams. In addition, we compared the observed ion recombination to calculations using the standard Boag two-voltage-analysis method, the more general theoretical Boag models, and the semiempirical general equation presented by Burns and McEwen.
METHODS: Two independent methods were used to investigate the ion recombination: (a) Varying the grid tension of the linear accelerator (linac) gun (controls the linac output) and measuring the relative effect the grid tension has on the chamber response at different source-to-surface distances (SSD). (b) Performing simultaneous dose measurements and comparing the dose-response, in beams with varying dose rate/dose-per-pulse, with the chamber together with dose rate/dose-per-pulse independent Gafchromic™ EBT3 film. Three individual Advanced Markus chambers were used for the measurements with both methods. All measurements were performed in electron beams with varying mean dose rate, dose rate within pulse, and dose-per-pulse (10-2  ≤ mean dose rate ≤ 103 Gy/s, 102  ≤ mean dose rate within pulse ≤ 107  Gy/s, 10-4  ≤ dose-per-pulse ≤ 101  Gy), which was achieved by independently varying the linac gun grid tension, and the SSD.
RESULTS: The results demonstrate how the ion collection efficiency of the chamber decreased as the dose-per-pulse increased, and that the ion recombination was dependent on the dose-per-pulse rather than the dose rate, a behavior predicted by Boag theory. The general theoretical Boag models agreed well with the data over the entire investigated dose-per-pulse range, but only for a low polarizing chamber voltage (50 V). However, the two-voltage-analysis method and the Burns & McEwen equation only agreed with the data at low dose-per-pulse values (≤ 10-2 and ≤ 10-1  Gy, respectively). An empirical model of the ion recombination in the chamber was found by fitting a logistic function to the data.
CONCLUSIONS: The ion collection efficiency of the Advanced Markus ionization chamber decreases for measurements in electron beams with increasingly higher dose-per-pulse. However, this chamber is still functional for dose measurements in beams with dose-per-pulse values up toward and above 10 Gy, if the ion recombination is taken into account. Our results show that existing models give a less-than-accurate description of the observed ion recombination. This motivates the use of the presented empirical model for measurements with the Advanced Markus chamber in high dose-per-pulse electron beams, as it enables accurate absorbed dose measurements (uncertainty estimation: 2.8-4.0%, k = 1). The model depends on the dose-per-pulse in the beam, and it is also influenced by the polarizing chamber voltage, with increasing ion recombination with a lowering of the voltage.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flash; high dose rate; ion recombination; ionization chamber

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28094853     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  An ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) technique for real-time dosimetric measurements for FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Oraiqat; Wei Zhang; Dale Litzenberg; Kwok Lam; Noora Ba Sunbul; Jean Moran; Kyle Cuneo; Paul Carson; Xueding Wang; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Kristoffer Petersson; Leila Alikhani; Chakradhar Yakkala; Barrett D Allen; Jonathan Ollivier; Benoit Petit; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Amber R Syage; Thuan A Nguyen; Al Anoud D Baddour; Celine Lu; Paramvir Singh; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Jean-François Germond; Pascal Froidevaux; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Faster and safer? FLASH ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Mark Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Maintenance of Tight Junction Integrity in the Absence of Vascular Dilation in the Brain of Mice Exposed to Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation.

Authors:  Barrett D Allen; Munjal M Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Claude Bailat; Benoît Petit; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles Limoli
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Biological Benefits of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy: Sleeping Beauty Awoken.

Authors:  M-C Vozenin; J H Hendry; C L Limoli
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Xiaochun Wang; Fada Guan; Uwe Titt; Kiminori Iga; Dadi Jiang; Takeshi Takaoka; Satoshi Tootake; Tadashi Katayose; Masumi Umezawa; Emil Schüler; Steven Frank; Steven H Lin; Narayan Sahoo; Albert C Koong; Radhe Mohan; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Polyphenolic extracts from the xerophyte Rhamnus lycioides as a radiation biodosimeter.

Authors:  Sihem Guesmi; Amel Raouafi; Ismail Amri; Ahmed Hicham Hamzaoui; Abdennacer Boulila; Faouzi Hosni; Haitham Sghaier
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation Limits Reactive Gliosis in the Brain.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Mineh Markarian; Barrett D Allen; Jabra D Baddour; Erich Giedzinski; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Benoît Petit; Claude Bailat; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles Limoli; Munjal M Acharya
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Establishment and Initial Experience of Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy in Canine Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Maja L Arendt; Kristine Bastholm Jensen; Betina Børresen; Anders E Hansen; Sven Bäck; Annemarie T Kristensen; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Crister Ceberg; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Monitoring electron energies during FLASH irradiations.

Authors:  Alexander Berne; Kristoffer Petersson; Iain D C Tullis; Robert G Newman; Borivoj Vojnovic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.