Literature DB >> 29206287

High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry: Commissioning of the Oriatron eRT6 prototype linear accelerator for preclinical use.

Maud Jaccard1, Maria Teresa Durán1, Kristoffer Petersson1, Jean-François Germond1, Philippe Liger2, Marie-Catherine Vozenin3,4, Jean Bourhis3,4, François Bochud1, Claude Bailat1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Oriatron eRT6 is an experimental high dose-per-pulse linear accelerator (linac) which was designed to deliver an electron beam with variable dose-rates, ranging from a few Gy/min up to hundreds of Gy/s. It was built to study the radiobiological effects of high dose-per-pulse/dose-rate electron beam irradiation, in the context of preclinical and cognitive studies. In this work, we report on the commissioning and beam monitoring of the Oriatron eRT6 prototype linac.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The beam was characterized in different steps. The output stability was studied by performing repeated measurements over a period of 20 months. The relative output variations caused by changing beam parameters, such as the temporal electron pulse width, the pulse repetition frequency and the pulse amplitude were also analyzed. Finally, depth dose curves and field sizes were measured for two different beam settings, resulting in one beam with a conventional radiotherapy dose-rate and one with a much higher dose-rate. Measurements were performed with Gafchromic EBT3 films and with a PTW Advanced Markus ionization chamber. In addition, we developed a beam current monitoring system based on the signals from an induction torus positioned at the beam exit of the waveguide and from a graphite beam collimator.
RESULTS: The stability of the output over repeated measurements was found to be good, with a standard deviation smaller than 1%. However, non-negligible day-to-day variations of the beam output were observed. Those output variations showed different trends depending on the dose-rate. The analysis of the relative output variation as a function of various beam parameters showed that in a given configuration, the dose-rate could be reliably varied over three orders of magnitude. Interdependence effects on the output variation between the parameters were also observed. The beam energy and field size were found to be slightly dose-rate-dependent and suitable mainly for small animal irradiation. The beam monitoring system was able to measure in a reproducible way the total charge of electrons that exit the machine, as long as the electron pulse amplitude remains above a given threshold. Furthermore, we were able to relate the charge measured with the monitoring system to the absorbed dose in a solid water phantom.
CONCLUSION: The Oriatron eRT6 was successfully commissioned for preclinical use and is currently in full operation, with studies being performed on the radiobiological effects of high dose-per-pulse irradiation.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beam monitoring; commissioning; high dose-per-pulse; high dose-rate; linac

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29206287     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  An ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) technique for real-time dosimetric measurements for FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Oraiqat; Wei Zhang; Dale Litzenberg; Kwok Lam; Noora Ba Sunbul; Jean Moran; Kyle Cuneo; Paul Carson; Xueding Wang; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Kristoffer Petersson; Leila Alikhani; Chakradhar Yakkala; Barrett D Allen; Jonathan Ollivier; Benoit Petit; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Amber R Syage; Thuan A Nguyen; Al Anoud D Baddour; Celine Lu; Paramvir Singh; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Jean-François Germond; Pascal Froidevaux; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Maintenance of Tight Junction Integrity in the Absence of Vascular Dilation in the Brain of Mice Exposed to Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation.

Authors:  Barrett D Allen; Munjal M Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Claude Bailat; Benoît Petit; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles Limoli
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Biological Benefits of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy: Sleeping Beauty Awoken.

Authors:  M-C Vozenin; J H Hendry; C L Limoli
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Development of Ultra-High Dose-Rate (FLASH) Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Arash Darafsheh; Jan Schuemann; Ivana Dokic; Olle Lundh; Tianyu Zhao; José Ramos-Méndez; Lei Dong; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-22

6.  Ultra-high dose rate radiation production and delivery systems intended for FLASH.

Authors:  Jonathan Farr; Veljko Grilj; Victor Malka; Srinivasan Sudharsan; Marco Schippers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Charles L Limoli; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Benoît Petit; Ioannis G Petridis; Philippe Fuchs; Ron Leavitt; Kristoffer Petersson; Maude Gondré; Jonathan Ollivier; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Jean-François Germond
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 13.801

8.  Evaluating the Reproducibility of Mouse Anatomy under Rotation in a Custom Immobilization Device for Conformal FLASH Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ryan B Ko; Luis A Soto; Rie von Eyben; Stavros Melemenidis; Erinn B Rankin; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Establishment and Initial Experience of Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy in Canine Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Maja L Arendt; Kristine Bastholm Jensen; Betina Børresen; Anders E Hansen; Sven Bäck; Annemarie T Kristensen; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Crister Ceberg; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Monitoring electron energies during FLASH irradiations.

Authors:  Alexander Berne; Kristoffer Petersson; Iain D C Tullis; Robert G Newman; Borivoj Vojnovic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.