| Literature DB >> 33239684 |
Kentaro Kawamura1, Shinobu Fukumura1, Koki Nikaido1, Nobutada Tachi2, Naoki Kozuka3, Tsugumi Seino3, Kingya Hatakeyama1, Mitsuru Mori2, Yoichi M Ito4, Akiyoshi Takami5, Shiro Hinotsu6, Atsushi Kuno7, Yukihiko Kawasaki1, Yoshiyuki Horio8, Hiroyuki Tsutsumi9.
Abstract
Muscular dystrophies (MDs) are inherited disorders characterized by progressive muscle weakness. Previously, we have shown that resveratrol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene), an antioxidant and an activator of the protein deacetylase SIRT1, decreases muscular and cardiac oxidative damage and improves pathophysiological conditions in animal MD models. To determine whether resveratrol provides therapeutic benefits to patients with MDs, an open-label, single-arm, phase IIa trial of resveratrol was conducted in 11 patients with Duchenne, Becker or Fukuyama MD. The daily dose of resveratrol was 500 mg/day, which was increased every 8 weeks to 1000 and then 1500 mg/day. Primary outcomes were motor function, evaluated by a motor function measure (MFM) scale, muscular strength, monitored with quantitative muscle testing (QMT), and serum creatine kinase (CK) levels. Adverse effects and tolerability were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Despite the advanced medical conditions of the patients, the mean MFM scores increased significantly from 34.6 to 38.4 after 24 weeks of medication. A twofold increase was found in the mean QMT scores of scapula elevation and shoulder abduction. Mean CK levels decreased considerably by 34%. Diarrhoea and abdominal pain was noted in six and three patients, respectively. Resveratrol may provide some benefit to MD patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33239684 PMCID: PMC7688653 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77197-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Participants characteristics.
| Type | Age, years | Sex | Weight (kg) | Genetic testing | Other diagnostic basis | Vignos scale | Brooke scale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duchenne | 12 | Male | 35.9 | Deletion of exon 18 | Grade 4 | Grade 2 | |
| 2 | 14 | Male | 27.5 | Deletion of exons 44–47 | Family history | Grade 9 | Grade 4 | |
| 3 | 17 | Male | 45.8 | Deletion of exon 11 | Grade 9 | Grade 6 | ||
| 4 | 23 | Male | 47.7 | Not available | Biopsy | Grade 9 | Grade 6 | |
| 5 | 39 | Male | 49.8 | Not available | Family history | Grade 9 | Grade 6 | |
| 6 | Becker | 23 | Male | 64.0 | Deletion of exons 45–48 | Grade 2 | Grade 1 | |
| 7 | 31 | Male | 71.0 | Deletion of exon 3 | Grade 9 | Grade 6 | ||
| 8 | 34 | Male | 64.5 | No copy number variation | Biopsy | Grade 3 | Grade 1 | |
| 9 | 46 | Male | 64.0 | Deletion of exons 45–48 | Biopsy | Grade 6 | Grade 2 | |
| 10 | Fukuyama | 12 | Female | 26.9 | Heterozygous for the founder haplotype | Brain MRI | Grade 9 | Grade 6 |
| 11 | 17 | Male | 22.6 | Homozygous for the founder haplotype | Biopsy | Grade 9 | Grade 6 |
Figure 1Protocol for resveratrol administration. Daily doses of resveratrol are shown, and visits along with blood and physical examinations are indicated by arrows.
Mean MFM scale and QMT scores of participants before resveratrol administration.
| Type of muscular dystrophy | Total (N = 11) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duchenne (N = 5) | Becker (N = 4) | Fukuyama (N = 2) | ||||||||||
| Number (%) | Range | Mean (SD) | Number (%) | Range | Mean (SD) | Number (%) | Range | Mean (SD) | Number (%) | Range | Mean (SD) | |
| MFM scale | 5 (100) | 2–63 | 22.2 (21.5) | 4 (100) | 38–85 | 64.5 (16.9) | 2 (100) | 2–10 | 6 | 11 (100) | 2–85 | 34.6 (29.3) |
| QMT pinch (N) | 5 (100) | 0.5–2.4 | 11.1 (0.7) | 4 (100) | 0.3–4.9 | 3.8 (2.1) | 2 (100) | 0.1–0.5 | 0.3 | 11 (100) | 0.1–4.9 | 1.9 (2.0) |
| QMT grip (kgf) | 3 (60) | 0.8–4.8 | 2.3 (1.8) | 4 (100) | 1.3–25.5 | 12.7 (9.5) | 0 (0) | – | – | 7 (64) | 0.8–25.5 | 8.3 (8.9) |
| QMT scapula elevation (kgf) | 4 (80) | 0.9–8.6 | 3.3 (3.1) | 4 (100) | 5.3–6.8 | 6.0 (0.6) | 2 (100) | 1.4–1.4 | 1.4 | 10 (91) | 0.9–8.6 | 4.0 (2.7) |
| QMT shoulder abducttion (kgf) | 1 (20) | – | 3.0 (–) | 4 (100) | 3.5–6.2 | 4.7 (1.0) | 0 (0) | – | – | 5 (45) | 3.0–6.2 | 4.4 (1.1) |
| QMT elbow flexion (kgf) | 1 (20) | – | 1.6 (–) | 4 (100) | 0.6–6.2 | 5.1 (3.0) | 1 (50) | – | 1.1 | 6 (55) | 0.6–6.2 | 3.9 (3.1) |
| QMT elbow extension (kgf) | 1 (20) | – | 2.8 (–) | 4 (100) | 3.1–9.2 | 5.7 (2.5) | 0 (0) | – | – | 5 (45) | 2.8–9.2 | 5.1 (2.5) |
| QMT hip flexion (kgf) | 1 (20) | – | 5.2 (–) | 4 (100) | 4.3–10.1 | 7.7 (2.2) | 0 (0) | – | – | 5 (45) | 4.3–10.1 | 7.2 (2.2) |
| QMT knee extension (kgf) | 2 (40) | 2.0–2.5 | 5.2 (–) | 4 (100) | 1.3–11.4 | 6.0 (3.9) | 0 (0) | – | – | 6 (55) | 1.3–11.4 | 4.8 (3.6) |
| QMT ankle dorsiflexion (kgf) | 1 (20) | – | 5.2 (–) | 4 (100) | 3.2–7.9 | 5.4 (2.2) | 1 (50) | – | 1.4 | 6 (55) | 1.4–7.9 | 4.4 (2.4) |
| Creatine kinase (unit/l) | 5 (100) | 200–9518 | 2522 (3518) | 4 (100) | 431–2807 | 1601 (1020) | 2 (100) | 840–1981 | 1411 | 11 (100) | 200–9518 | 1985 (2512) |
Figure 2Motor function scores following resveratrol administration. (a) Total score, (b) D1 sub-score in standing position and transfers, (c) D2 sub-score in axial and proximal motor function, and (d) D3 sub-score in distal motor function of each patient are measured with the MFM scale before (Pre) and at 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Black lines show mean values. Average values at each visit were compared with those before medication and were analysed using ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed using Dunnett’s test. P values < 0.05 are indicated. NS: not significant.
Figure 3Muscle strength following resveratrol administration. (a–c) Time course of muscle strength for (a) scapula elevation (N = 10), (b) shoulder abduction (N = 5), and (c) pinch (N = 11) measured by quantitative muscle testing (QMT) using a hand-held dynamometer and pinch strength metre before (Pre) and 8, 16, and 24 weeks after resveratrol administration. The daily dose of each patient is also shown, except that one patient with FCMD (FCMD 12 y) received 1000 instead of 1500 mg/day. Black lines show mean values. Average values at each visit were compared with those before medication and were analysed using ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed using Dunnett’s test. P values < 0.05 are indicated. NS: not significant.
Figure 4Serum creatine kinase (CK) levels following resveratrol administration. (a) Mean serum CK levels of all participants with standard deviation. (b–d) Change in CK activity in each patient with (b) Duchenne, (c) Becker, or (d) Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy. Black lines show the mean CK levels.
Figure 5Serum resveratrol concentration at doses of 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/day. (a) Mean serum resveratrol levels of all participants with standard deviation (N = 11). (b–d) Serum resveratrol level and time from resveratrol ingestion to blood drawing in each patient are shown by a dot. RSV: resveratrol.
Adverse events following resveratrol administration.
| Symptom | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | 4 | 2 | 6 (54.5) | |||
| Abdominal pain | 3 | 3 (27.3) | ||||
| Upper respiratory infection | 1 | 1 | 2 (18.2) | |||
| Lung infection | 1 | 1 (9.1) | ||||
| Alopecia | 1 | 1 (9.1) | ||||
| Erythema multiform | 1 | 1 (9.1) | ||||
| Rash acneiform | 1 | 1 (9.1) |
The numbers of patients are indicated.