Literature DB >> 33238247

Patient's body composition can significantly affect RF power deposition in the tissue around DBS implants: ramifications for lead management strategies and MRI field-shaping techniques.

Bhumi Bhusal1, Boris Keil2, Joshua Rosenow3, Ehsan Kazemivalipour4, Laleh Golestanirad1,5.   

Abstract

Patients with active implants such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices have limited access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to risks associated with RF heating of implants in MRI environment. With an aging population and increased prevalence of neurodegenerative disease, the indication for MRI exams in patients with such implants increases as well. In response to this growing need, many groups have investigated strategies to mitigate RF heating of DBS implants during MRI. These efforts fall into two main categories: MRI field-shaping methods, where the electric field of the MRI RF coil is modified to reduce the interaction with implanted leads, and lead management techniques where surgical modifications in the trajectory reduces the coupling with RF fields. Studies that characterize these techniques, however, have relied either on simulations with homogenous body models, or experiments with box-shaped single-material phantoms. It is well established, however, that the shape and heterogeneity of human body affects the distribution of RF electric fields, which by proxy, alters the heating of an implant inside the body. In this contribution, we applied numerical simulations and phantom experiments to examine the degree to which variations in patient's body composition affects RF power deposition. We then assessed effectiveness of RF-heating mitigation strategies under variant patient body compositions. Our results demonstrated that patient's body composition substantially alters RF power deposition in the tissue around implanted leads. However, both techniques based on MRI field-shaping and DBS lead management performed well under variant body types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33238247      PMCID: PMC8693336          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcde9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  36 in total

1.  Modeling of radio-frequency induced currents on lead wires during MR imaging using a modified transmission line method.

Authors:  Volkan Acikel; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  1.5T versus 3T MRI for targeting subthalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsin Cheng; Hsing-Ming Huang; Hung-Lin Lin; Shang-Ming Chiou
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging.

Authors:  C R Camacho; D B Plewes; R M Henkelman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  On the SAR and field inhomogeneity of birdcage coils loaded with the human head.

Authors:  J Jin; J Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Parallel radiofrequency transmission at 3 tesla to improve safety in bilateral implanted wires in a heterogeneous model.

Authors:  Clare E McElcheran; Benson Yang; Kevan J T Anderson; Laleh Golestanirad; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Reducing RF-induced Heating near Implanted Leads through High-Dielectric Capacitive Bleeding of Current (CBLOC).

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; John Kirsch; Sean Downs; Boris Keil; Giorgio Bonmassar; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories.

Authors:  Ehsan Kazemivalipour; Boris Keil; Alireza Vali; Sunder Rajan; Behzad Elahi; Ergin Atalar; Lawrence L Wald; Joshua Rosenow; Julie Pilitsis; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Reduction of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating in deep brain stimulation leads using a lead management device.

Authors:  Kenneth B Baker; Jean Tkach; John D Hall; John A Nyenhuis; Frank G Shellock; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Functional MRI Safety and Artifacts during Deep Brain Stimulation: Experience in 102 Patients.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Tanweer Rashid; Ileana Hancu; Gavin J B Elias; Robert M Gramer; Jürgen Germann; Marisa Dimarzio; Bryan Li; Vijayashankar Paramanandam; Sreeram Prasad; Manish Ranjan; Ailish Coblentz; Dave Gwun; Clement T Chow; Ricardo Maciel; Derrick Soh; Eric Fiveland; Mojgan Hodaie; Suneil K Kalia; Alfonso Fasano; Walter Kucharczyk; Julie Pilitsis; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: The role of surgical lead management.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; John Kirsch; Giorgio Bonmassar; Sean Downs; Behzad Elahi; Alastair Martin; Maria-Ida Iacono; Leonardo M Angelone; Boris Keil; Lawrence L Wald; Julie Pilitsis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Kazemivalipour; Bhumi Bhusal; Jasmine Vu; Stella Lin; Bach Thanh Nguyen; John Kirsch; Elizabeth Nowac; Julie Pilitsis; Joshua Rosenow; Ergin Atalar; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads.

Authors:  Bach T Nguyen; Bhumi Bhusal; Amir Ali Rahsepar; Kate Fawcett; Stella Lin; Daniel S Marks; Rod Passman; Donny Nieto; Richard Niemzcura; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.737

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.