| Literature DB >> 31385756 |
Alexandre Boutet1, Tanweer Rashid1, Ileana Hancu1, Gavin J B Elias1, Robert M Gramer1, Jürgen Germann1, Marisa Dimarzio1, Bryan Li1, Vijayashankar Paramanandam1, Sreeram Prasad1, Manish Ranjan1, Ailish Coblentz1, Dave Gwun1, Clement T Chow1, Ricardo Maciel1, Derrick Soh1, Eric Fiveland1, Mojgan Hodaie1, Suneil K Kalia1, Alfonso Fasano1, Walter Kucharczyk1, Julie Pilitsis1, Andres M Lozano1.
Abstract
BackgroundWith growing numbers of patients receiving deep brain stimulation (DBS), radiologists are encountering these neuromodulation devices at an increasing rate. Current MRI safety guidelines, however, limit MRI access in these patients.PurposeTo describe an MRI (1.5 T and 3 T) experience and safety profile in a large cohort of participants with active DBS systems and characterize the hardware-related artifacts on images from functional MRI.Materials and MethodsIn this prospective study, study participants receiving active DBS underwent 1.5- or 3-T MRI (T1-weighted imaging and gradient-recalled echo [GRE]-echo-planar imaging [EPI]) between June 2017 and October 2018. Short- and long-term adverse events were tracked. The authors quantified DBS hardware-related artifacts on images from GRE-EPI (functional MRI) at the cranial coil wire and electrode contacts. Segmented artifacts were then transformed into standard space to define the brain areas affected by signal loss. Two-sample t tests were used to assess the difference in artifact size between 1.5- and 3-T MRI.ResultsA total of 102 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 60 years ± 11; 65 men) were evaluated. No MRI-related short- and long-term adverse events or acute changes were observed. DBS artifacts were most prominent near the electrode contacts and over the frontoparietal cortical area where the redundancy of the extension wire is placed subcutaneously. The mean electrode contact artifact diameter was 9.3 mm ± 1.6, and 1.9% ± 0.8 of the brain was obscured by the coil artifact. The coil artifacts were larger at 3 T than at 1.5 T, obscuring 2.1% ± 0.7 and 1.4% ± 0.7 of intracranial volume, respectively (P < .001). The superficial frontoparietal cortex and deep structures neighboring the electrode contacts were most commonly obscured.ConclusionWith a priori local safety testing, patients receiving deep brain stimulation may safely undergo 1.5- and 3-T MRI. Deep brain stimulation hardware-related artifacts only affect a small proportion of the brain.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the editorial by Martin in this issue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31385756 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiology ISSN: 0033-8419 Impact factor: 11.105