Literature DB >> 30630944

Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System.

Joyce van Sluis1, Johan de Jong2, Jenny Schaar2, Walter Noordzij2, Paul van Snick2, Rudi Dierckx2, Ronald Borra2, Antoon Willemsen2, Ronald Boellaard2.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of the Biograph Vision digital PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU 2-2012 standard (published by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association [NEMA]) to allow for a reliable, reproducible, and intersystem-comparable performance measurement.
Methods: The new digital PET/CT system features silicon photomultiplier-based detectors with 3.2-mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals and full coverage of the scintillator area. The PET components incorporate 8 rings of 38 detector blocks, and each block contains 4 × 2 mini blocks. Each mini block consists of a 5 × 5 lutetium oxyorthosilicate array of 3.2 × 3.2 × 20 mm crystals coupled to a silicon photomultiplier array of 16 × 16 mm, resulting in an axial field of view of 26.1 cm. In this study, PET/CT system performance was evaluated for conformation with the NEMA NU 2-2012 standard, with additional measurements described in the new NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count-rate performance, accuracy of attenuation and scatter correction, image quality, coregistration accuracy, and time-of-flight performance were determined. Measurements were directly compared with results from its predecessor, the Biograph mCT Flow, using existing literature. Moreover, feasibility to comply with the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd. (EARL) criteria was evaluated, and some illustrative patient PET images were obtained.
Results: The Biograph Vision showed a transverse and axial spatial resolution of 3.6 and 3.5 mm, respectively, in full width at half maximum at a 1-cm offset from the center of the field of view (measured with a 22Na 0.25-mm point source), a NEMA sensitivity of 16.4 kcps/MBq, and a NEMA peak noise-equivalent count-rate of 306 kcps at 32 kBq/mL. Time-of-flight resolution varied from 210 to 215 as count-rate increased up to the peak noise-equivalent count-rate. The overall image contrast seen with the NEMA image quality phantom ranged from 77.2% to 89.8%. Furthermore, the system was able to comply with the current and future EARL performance criteria.
Conclusion: The Biograph Vision outperforms the analog Biograph mCT Flow, and the system is able to meet European harmonizing performance standards.
© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NEMA; PET/CT; digital detectors; performance evaluation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30630944     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.215418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  73 in total

Review 1.  The Importance of Time-of-Flight Reconstruction and Point Spread Modeling in the Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow Parameters.

Authors:  James A Case
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Digital PET/CT: a new intriguing chance for clinical nuclear medicine and personalized molecular imaging.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Nicoletta Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  NEMA NU2-2012 performance measurements of the United Imaging uPMR790: an integrated PET/MR system.

Authors:  Shuguang Chen; Yushen Gu; Haojun Yu; Xin Chen; Tuoyu Cao; Lingzhi Hu; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Photon counting detectors and their applications ranging from particle physics experiments to environmental radiation monitoring and medical imaging.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ota
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-03-19

5.  Total Body PET: Why, How, What for?

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin R Pantel; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 6.  Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Three-dimensional Fourier-based reprojection analytic reconstruction from histoprojections for high-resolution time-of-flight positron emission tomography scanners.

Authors:  Vladimir Y Panin; Samuel Matej
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-02

8.  High-Resolution Depth-Encoding PET Detector Module with Prismatoid Light-Guide Array.

Authors:  Andy LaBella; Xinjie Cao; Eric Petersen; Rick Lubinsky; Anat Biegon; Wei Zhao; Amir H Goldan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge.

Authors:  Paul Lecoq; Christian Morel; John O Prior; Dimitris Visvikis; Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Peter Križan; Rosana Martinez Turtos; Dominique Thers; Edoardo Charbon; Joao Varela; Christophe de La Taille; Angelo Rivetti; Dominique Breton; Jean-François Pratte; Johan Nuyts; Suleman Surti; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Paul Marsden; Katia Parodi; Jose Maria Benlloch; Mathieu Benoit
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Multiparametric Cardiac 18F-FDG PET in Humans: Kinetic Model Selection and Identifiability Analysis.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Ramsey D Badawi; Cameron C Foster; Thomas Smith; Javier E López; Guobao Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.