Literature DB >> 24080962

Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application.

Nicolas A Karakatsanis1, Martin A Lodge, Abdel K Tahari, Y Zhou, Richard L Wahl, Arman Rahmim.   

Abstract

Static whole-body PET/CT, employing the standardized uptake value (SUV), is considered the standard clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment response monitoring for a wide range of oncologic malignancies. Alternative PET protocols involving dynamic acquisition of temporal images have been implemented in the research setting, allowing quantification of tracer dynamics, an important capability for tumor characterization and treatment response monitoring. Nonetheless, dynamic protocols have been confined to single-bed-coverage limiting the axial field-of-view to ~15-20 cm, and have not been translated to the routine clinical context of whole-body PET imaging for the inspection of disseminated disease. Here, we pursue a transition to dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging, by presenting, within a unified framework, clinically feasible multi-bed dynamic PET acquisition protocols and parametric imaging methods. We investigate solutions to address the challenges of: (i) long acquisitions, (ii) small number of dynamic frames per bed, and (iii) non-invasive quantification of kinetics in the plasma. In the present study, a novel dynamic (4D) whole-body PET acquisition protocol of ~45 min total length is presented, composed of (i) an initial 6 min dynamic PET scan (24 frames) over the heart, followed by (ii) a sequence of multi-pass multi-bed PET scans (six passes × seven bed positions, each scanned for 45 s). Standard Patlak linear graphical analysis modeling was employed, coupled with image-derived plasma input function measurements. Ordinary least squares Patlak estimation was used as the baseline regression method to quantify the physiological parameters of tracer uptake rate Ki and total blood distribution volume V on an individual voxel basis. Extensive Monte Carlo simulation studies, using a wide set of published kinetic FDG parameters and GATE and XCAT platforms, were conducted to optimize the acquisition protocol from a range of ten different clinically acceptable sampling schedules examined. The framework was also applied to six FDG PET patient studies, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Both simulated and clinical results indicated enhanced contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for Ki images in tumor regions with notable background FDG concentration, such as the liver, where SUV performed relatively poorly. Overall, the proposed framework enables enhanced quantification of physiological parameters across the whole body. In addition, the total acquisition length can be reduced from 45 to ~35 min and still achieve improved or equivalent CNR compared to SUV, provided the true Ki contrast is sufficiently high. In the follow-up companion paper, a set of advanced linear regression schemes is presented to particularly address the presence of noise, and attempt to achieve a better trade-off between the mean-squared error and the CNR metrics, resulting in enhanced task-based imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24080962      PMCID: PMC3941007          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/20/7391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  67 in total

1.  Maximum a posteriori reconstruction of the Patlak parametric image from sinograms in dynamic PET.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Lin Fu; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Resampling estimates of precision in emission tomography.

Authors:  D R Haynor; S D Woods
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology.

Authors:  Kjell Erlandsson; Irène Buvat; P Hendrik Pretorius; Benjamin A Thomas; Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Clinical Impact of Cardiac-Gated PET Imaging.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla; Julia Dinges; Christoph Rischpler
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2012-11-26

5.  Whole-body PET/MRI: the future in oncological imaging.

Authors:  Marcus D Seemann
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-10

6.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET.

Authors:  W A Weber; S I Ziegler; R Thödtmann; A R Hanauske; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Roland Hustinx; François Bénard; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 8.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man.

Authors:  S C Huang; M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; K Sideris; C J Selin; D E Kuhl
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-01

10.  Initial evaluation of dynamic human imaging using 18F-FRP170 as a new PET tracer for imaging hypoxia.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kaneta; Yoshihiro Takai; Ren Iwata; Takashi Hakamatsuka; Hiroyasu Yasuda; Katsutoshi Nakayama; Yoichi Ishikawa; Shoichi Watanuki; Shozo Furumoto; Yoshihito Funaki; Eiko Nakata; Keiichi Jingu; Michihiko Tsujitani; Masatoshi Ito; Hiroshi Fukuda; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.668

View more
  51 in total

1.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [18F]FDG Static (SUV) vs. Patlak (Ki) Whole-body PET Imaging Using Different Segmentation Methods: a Simulation Study.

Authors:  Mingzan Zhuang; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Clinical perspectives for the use of total body PET/CT.

Authors:  Ronan Abgral; David Bourhis; Pierre-Yves Salaun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Arman Rahmim; Pardis Ghaffarian; Parham Geramifar; Hamid Abdollahi; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Vladimir Y Panin; Yun Zhou; Alan McMillan; Steve Cho; Habib Zaidi; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Impact of Tissue Classification in MRI-Guided Attenuation Correction on Whole-Body Patlak PET/MRI.

Authors:  Mingzan Zhuang; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Patlak image estimation from dual time-point list-mode PET data.

Authors:  Wentao Zhu; Quanzheng Li; Bing Bai; Peter S Conti; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Dynamic PET simulator via tomographic emission projection for kinetic modeling and parametric image studies.

Authors:  Ida Häggström; Bradley J Beattie; C Ross Schmidtlein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Imager-4D: New Software for Viewing Dynamic PET Scans and Extracting Radiomic Parameters from PET Data.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Lilja B Solnes; Yafu Yin; Grant Kitchen; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Arman Rahmim; Martin G Pomper; Jeffrey P Leal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Structural and practical identifiability of dual-input kinetic modeling in dynamic PET of liver inflammation.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Souvik Sarkar; Michael T Corwin; Kristin Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.