| Literature DB >> 33202897 |
Sophie Gallier1, Louise Tolenaars1, Colin Prosser1.
Abstract
Cow milk is the most common dairy milk and has been extensively researched for its functional, technological and nutritional properties for a wide range of products. One such product category is infant formula, which is the most suitable alternative to feed infants, when breastfeeding is not possible. Most infant formulas are based on cow milk protein ingredients. For several reasons, consumers now seek alternatives such as goat milk, which has increasingly been used to manufacture infant, follow-on and young child formulas over the last 30 years. While similar in many aspects, compositional and functional differences exist between cow and goat milk. This offers the opportunity to explore different formulations or manufacturing options for formulas based on goat milk. The use of whole goat milk as the only source of proteins in formulas allows levels of milk fat, short and medium chain fatty acids, sn-2 palmitic acid, and milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) to be maximised. These features improve the composition and microstructure of whole goat milk-based infant formula, providing similarities to the complex human milk fat globules, and have been shown to benefit digestion, and cognitive and immune development. Recent research indicates a role for milk fat and MFGM on digestive health, the gut-brain axis and the gut-skin axis. This review highlights the lipid composition of whole goat milk-based infant formula and its potential for infant nutrition to support healthy digestion, brain development and immunity. Further work is warranted on the role of these components in allergy development and the advantages of goat milk fat and MFGM for infant nutrition and health.Entities:
Keywords: goat milk; infant formula; infant nutrition; milk fat; milk fat globule membrane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33202897 PMCID: PMC7696746 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Fatty acid concentration (% of total fatty acids) in human milk, cow milk, goat milk and whole goat milk-based infant formula.
| Human Milk 1 Europe | Human Milk 1 Asia | Cow Milk 2 | Goat Milk 2 | Whole Goat Milk-Based IF 3 | Whole Goat Milk-Based IF 4 55% MF | Cow Milk-Based IF Vegetable Oil Only 6 | Cow Milk-Based IF MF 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butyric acid C4:0 | ND | ND | 3.2–3.3 | 2.0–2.6 | 1.17 | 3.1 | ND | 2.4 |
| Caproic acid C6:0 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 1.6–2.1 | 2.4–2.9 | 1.06 | 2.5 | ND/0.2 | 1.3 |
| Caprylic acid C8:0 | 0.19 (0.09–0.24) | 0.17 (0.11–0.28) | 1.2–1.3 | 2.7–2.7 | 1.11 | 2.0 | 1.2/2.5 | 1.7 |
| Capric acid C10:0 | 1.29 (0.83–1.63) | 1.31 (0.52–2.48) | 3.0–3.1 | 8.4–9.7 | 3.43 | 7.3 | 1.1/1.8 | 2.2 |
| Lauric acid C12:0 | 5.98 (4.15–8.33) | 5.56 (2.97–13.82) | 3.1–3.3 | 3.3–4.3 | 1.54 | 4.2 | 5.4/13.4 | 6.3 |
| Myristic acid C14:0 | 6.44 (4.98–9.38) | 5.70 (3.50–12.12) | 9.5–12.1 | 9.6–10.3 | 3.68 | 7.0 | 4.6/5.2 | 7.2 |
| Myristoleic acid C14:1 | 0.18 | 0.26 (0.03–1.11) | 0.7–1.1 | 0.09–0.16 | 0.12 | ND | ND/ND | 0.8 |
| Pentadecanoic acid C15:0 | 0.25 (0.16–0.32) | 0.20 (0.08–0.50) | ND | ND | 0.35 | 0.6 | ND/ND | 0.6 |
| Palmitic acid C16:0 | 21.93 (15.43–25.62) | 21.78 (17.55–29.00) | 26.5–32.2 | 24.6–27.7 | 12.30 | 17.0 | 26.3/7.7 | 18.9 |
| Palmitoleic acid C16:1 | 1.98 (1.65–2.31) | 2.44 (1.29–4.59) | ND | ND | 0.39 | ND | 0.6/0.1 | 1.1 |
| Heptadecanoic acid C17:0 | 0.29 (0.22–0.33) | 0.28 (0.19–0.41) | ND | ND | 0.29 | 0.4 | ND/ND | 0.3 |
| Stearic acid C18:0 | 7.37 (5.58–9.52) | 5.58 (3.90–6.79) | 8.9–14.6 | 9.7–12.5 | 5.89 | 6.3 | 5.3/3.2 | 6.7 |
| Oleic acid C18:1 | 36.30 (28.93–41.69) | 30.80 (21.85–36.96) | 19.3–24.1 | 19.4–24.0 | 40.65 | 31.0 | 37.6/43.3 | 28.1 |
| Linoleic acid C18:2 | 13.99 (10.16–16.59) | 16.90 (7.53–24.29) | ND | ND | 10.79 | 14.0 | 14.0/20.5 | 16.7 |
| Conjugated linoleic acid C18:2 | 0.27–0.49 5 | ND | 0.1–1.9 | 0.4–3.7 | 0.33 | ND | ND/ND | ND |
| α-linolenic acid C18:3 | 0.76 (0.49–1.05) | 1.47 (0.35–4.06) | ND | ND | 1.58 | 1.2 | 1.6/1.8 | 1.5 |
| Arachidic acid C20:0 | 0.21 (0.14–0.31) | 0.32 (0.03–2.97) | ND | ND | 0.24 | 0.3 | ND/0.3 | 0.3 |
| Arachidonic acid C20:4 | 0.47 (0.37–0.64) | 0.64 (0.30–2.57) | ND | ND | 0.45 | ND | 0.3/0.3 | ND |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid C20:5 | 0.09 (0.05–0.13) | 0.31 (0.07–1.59) | ND | ND | 0.12 | ND | ND/0.0 | ND |
| Behenic acid C22:0 | 0.09 (0.05–0.13) | 0.08 (0.05–0.14) | ND | ND | 0.33 | ND | ND/0.4 | 0.1 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid C22:6 | 0.28 (0.18–0.42) | 0.55 (0.19–1.13) | ND | ND | 0.44 | ND | 0.2/0.2 | ND |
| Tetracosanoic acid C24:0 | 0.07 (0.03–0.16) | 0.07 (0.01–0.14) | ND | ND | 0.21 | ND | ND/0.1 | ND |
1 from [3]. 2 from [26]. 3 Measured using gas chromatography (n = 2). 4 from [25]. 5 from [29]. 6 from [3]; values (%/%) are for cow milk-based IF manufactured with a blend of vegetable oils with palm oil/without palm oil. ND: not determined. IF: infant formula. MF: milk fat.
sn-2 palmitic acid percentage in human milk, cow milk, goat milk and whole goat milk-based infant formula.
| Human Milk 1,2 | Cow Milk 2,3 | Goat Milk 3 | Whole Goat Milk-Based IF 4 48% MF | Whole Goat Milk-Based IF 3 55% MF | Cow Milk-Based IF Vegetable Oils Only 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 51–88 | 37–45 | 35 | 29.5 | 31 | 10–20/39–47 5 |
1 from [6,35]. 2 from [3]. 3 from [25]. 4 Measured with ISO 6800 by ITERG, France (n = 6). 5 Values (%/%) are given for cow milk-based IF manufactured with a blend of vegetable oils without structured palm oil/with structured palm oil. IF: infant formula; MF: milk fat.
Cholesterol concentration (mg/L) in human milk, cow milk, goat milk and whole goat milk-based infant formula.
| Human Milk 1 | Cow Milk 2 | Goat Milk 3 | Whole Moat Milk-Based IF 4 | Cow Milk-Based IF 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol (mg/L) | 90–200 | 100–300 | 100–200 | 58 | 14.6–51 |
1 from [40,41]. 2 from [3,41]. 3 from [30]. 4 Measured using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (AOAC 970.51) (n = 6). 5 from [38] from a range of commercial IFs with or without the addition of cow milk fat and MFGM. IF: infant formula.
Total phospholipid concentration (mg/L) and percentage of phospholipid species (% of total phospholipids) in human milk, cow milk, goat milk and whole goat milk-based infant formula.
| Human Milk 1 | Cow Milk 3 | Goat Milk 3 | Whole Moat Milk-Based IF 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total PL (mg/L) | 286.6 (98–474 2) | 294–400 5 | 276 5 | 169.2 |
| PL (mg/L) | ||||
| PI | 2.2–21 | 0.5–26.7 6 | 21.1 4 | 17.5 |
| PC | 32–124 | 18.2–128.0 6 | 93.7 4 | 51.6 |
| PS | 11–45 | 2.5–56.5 6 | 38.7 4 | 18.3 |
| PE | 26–103 | 19.2–143.0 6 | 91.6 4 | 40.2 |
| SM | 25–177 | 11.9–98.9 6 | 91.2 4,7 | 38.7 7 |
| % of total phospholipids | ||||
| PI | 1.1–10 | 0.1–9.0 | 2.21–9.4 | 11 |
| PC | 19–38 | 25.9–33.2 | 27.4–31.6 | 31 |
| PS | 3.7–17 | 0.12–9.1 | 2.41–14.0 | 11 |
| PE | 5.9–36 | 23.4–46.7 | 26.9–46.1 | 24 |
| SM | 29–43 | 19.8–25.4 | 16.1–27.3 | 23 7 |
1 from [38]. 2 from [49]. 3 from [26]. 4 Measured using 31Phosphorus-nuclear magnetic resonance (n = 3 for goat milk and n = 5 for IF). 5 from [51]. 6 from [52]. 7 sum of SM and DHSM (dihydrosphingomyelin). PL: phospholipids; PI: phosphatidylinositol; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PS: phosphatidylserine; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; SM: sphingomyelin.
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy images of raw goat milk. (A) showing goat milk caseins and fat globules with a thick MFGM. (B) showing a milk fat globule with a cytoplasmic crescent (white arrow). Black arrows point at the MFGM surrounding fat globules. Goat milk was collected from a single goat in a New Zealand goat farm and kept at room temperature until processing within 2 h using the same method as in Gallier et al. [5]. Scale bar = 0.5 µm.
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopy images (A and B) of reconstituted whole goat milk powder (Dairy Goat Co-operative, Hamilton, New Zealand) processed using the same method as in Gallier et al. [5]. Black arrows point at the MFGM surrounding fat globules (A) or as fragments in the serum phase (A and B). White arrows point at fat globules with adsorbed small casein micelles (A and B). Scale bar = 0.5 µm.
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopy images (A and B) of reconstituted whole goat milk-based infant formula (Dairy Goat Co-operative, Hamilton, New Zealand) processed using the same method as in Gallier et al. [5]. Black arrows point at MFGM fragments in the serum phase (A and B). Full white arrow points at an MFGM fragment with attached cytoplasmic crescent filled with electron-dense material (B). Dashed white arrows point at droplets with thicker interface (B). Scale bars = 200 nm (A) and 1 µm (B).