Literature DB >> 33202397

A digital phoswich detector using time-over-threshold for depth of interaction in PET.

David L Prout1,2, Zheng Gu1,3,2, Max Shustef1, Arion F Chatziioannou1.   

Abstract

We present the performance of a digital phoswich positron emission tomography (PET) detector, composed by layers of pixilated scintillator arrays, read out by solid state light detectors and an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). We investigated the use of integrated charge from the scintillation pulses along with time-over-threshold (ToT) to determine the layer of interaction (DOI) in the scintillator. Simulations were performed to assess the effectiveness of the ToT measurements for separating the scintillator events and identifying cross-layer-crystal-scatter (CLCS) events. These simulations indicate that ToT and charge integration from such a detector provide sufficient information to determine the layer of interaction. To demonstrate this in practice, we used a pair of prototype LYSO/BGO detectors. One detector consisted of a 19 × 19 array of 7 mm long LYSO crystals (1.36 mm pitch) coupled to a 16 × 16 array of 8 mm long BGO crystals (1.63 mm pitch). The other detector was similar except the LYSO crystal pitch was 1.63 mm. These detectors were coupled to an 8 × 8 multi-pixel photon counter mounted on a PETsys TOFPET2 ASIC. This high performance ASIC provided digital readout of the integrated charge and ToT from these detectors. We present a method to separate the events from the two scintillator layers using the ToT, and also investigate the performance of this detector. All the crystals within the proposed detector were clearly resolved, and the peak to valley ratio was 11.8 ± 4.0 and 10.1 ± 2.9 for the LYSO and BGO flood images. The measured energy resolution was 9.9% ± 1.3% and 28.5% ± 5.0% respectively for the LYSO and BGO crystals in the phoswich layers. The timing resolution between the LYSO-LYSO, LYSO-BGO and BGO-BGO coincidences was 468 ps, 1.33 ns and 2.14 ns respectively. Results show ToT can be used to identify the crystal layer where events occurred and also identify and reject the majority of CLCS events between layers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33202397      PMCID: PMC8382115          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcb21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  29 in total

1.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  BGO as a hybrid scintillator / Cherenkov radiator for cost-effective time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  S E Brunner; D R Schaart
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Performance of a PET Insert for High-Resolution Small-Animal PET/MRI at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Greg Stortz; Jonathan D Thiessen; Daryl Bishop; Muhammad Salman Khan; Piotr Kozlowski; Fabrice Retière; Graham Schellenberg; Ehsan Shams; Xuezhu Zhang; Christopher J Thompson; Andrew L Goertzen; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Performance evaluation of HiPET, a high sensitivity and high resolution preclinical PET tomograph.

Authors:  Zheng Gu; Richard Taschereau; Nam T Vu; David L Prout; Jason Lee; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Performance characterization of a new high resolution PET scintillation detector.

Authors:  A Vandenbroucke; A M K Foudray; P D Olcott; C S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Time-over-threshold for pulse shape discrimination in a time-of-flight phoswich PET detector.

Authors:  Chen-Ming Chang; Joshua W Cates; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Study of a high-resolution, 3D positioning cadmium zinc telluride detector for PET.

Authors:  Y Gu; J L Matteson; R T Skelton; A C Deal; E A Stephan; F Duttweiler; T M Gasaway; C S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Compton PET: a layered structure PET detector with high performance.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Martin S Judenhofer; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Clinical applications of PET in brain tumors.

Authors:  Wei Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of PETbox4, a high sensitivity dedicated PET preclinical tomograph.

Authors:  Z Gu; R Taschereau; N T Vu; H Wang; D L Prout; R W Silverman; B Bai; D B Stout; M E Phelps; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  A time-based single transmission-line readout with position multiplexing.

Authors:  Minseok Yi; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2022-01-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.