Literature DB >> 3698752

Temporary ileostomy for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Function and complications.

A M Metcalf, R R Dozois, R W Beart, K A Kelly, B G Wolff.   

Abstract

The function and complications associated with temporary ileostomies were reviewed in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A series of 180 patients had temporary ileostomies established (157 loop, 23 Brooke). Patients with incomplete fecal diversion had a significantly higher incidence of pouch-anal anastomotic complications (44 percent) than did those with complete diversion (14 percent). Patients with loop ileostomies were more likely than patients with Brooke ileostomies to develop technique-related complications (18 percent vs. 13 percent) and peristomal irritation (54 percent vs. 26 percent). The most frequent complications after take-down of the ileostomy were transient bowel obstruction (13 percent) and peritonitis (7 percent). These complications could not be related to the type of stoma used or the interval to closure. Temporary diversion of a pouch-anal anastomosis decreased the incidence of anastomotic complications. These ileostomies, however, are associated with a significant risk of complications, which can be minimized by meticulous surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3698752     DOI: 10.1007/bf02554114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  20 in total

1.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the Irish experience. Irish Association of Coloproctology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery.

Authors:  Peter W G Carne; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

3.  The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch.

Authors:  K Maeda; M Hashimoto; J Koh; O Yamamoto; Y Hosoda; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  I M Bain; R Patel; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  B A Taylor; R R Dozois
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Loop ileostomy fixation: a simple technique to minimise the risk of stomal volvulus.

Authors:  D N Anderson; C P Driver; K G Park; A I Davidson; R A Keenan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Early results with restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P E Burke; J Lappin; J Hyland
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The role of the defunctioning ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  M Barry; K Mealy; J Hyland
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.