Literature DB >> 33156569

A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.

Maria Carla Piastra1,2,3, Andreas Nüßing1,2, Johannes Vorwerk4, Maureen Clerc5,6, Christian Engwer2,7, Carsten H Wolters1,8.   

Abstract

Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) maps are a good way to visualize electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensitivity. SNR maps extend the knowledge about the modulation of EEG and MEG signals by source locations and orientations and can therefore help to better understand and interpret measured signals as well as source reconstruction results thereof. Our work has two main objectives. First, we investigated the accuracy and reliability of EEG and MEG finite element method (FEM)-based sensitivity maps for three different head models, namely an isotropic three and four-compartment and an anisotropic six-compartment head model. As a result, we found that ignoring the cerebrospinal fluid leads to an overestimation of EEG SNR values. Second, we examined and compared EEG and MEG SNR mappings for both cortical and subcortical sources and their modulation by source location and orientation. Our results for cortical sources show that EEG sensitivity is higher for radial and deep sources and MEG for tangential ones, which are the majority of sources. As to the subcortical sources, we found that deep sources with sufficient tangential source orientation are recordable by the MEG. Our work, which represents the first comprehensive study where cortical and subcortical sources are considered in highly detailed FEM-based EEG and MEG SNR mappings, sheds a new light on the sensitivity of EEG and MEG and might influence the decision of brain researchers or clinicians in their choice of the best modality for their experiment or diagnostics, respectively.
© 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electroencephalography; finite element method; magnetoencephalography; sensitivity map; signal-to-noise ratio; subcortical sources; volume conduction modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33156569      PMCID: PMC7856654          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.399


  82 in total

1.  Lead-field bases for electroencephalography source imaging.

Authors:  D Weinstein; L Zhukov; C Johnson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Effects of electrode properties on EEG measurements and a related inverse problem.

Authors:  J O Ollikainen; M Vauhkonen; P A Karjalainen; J P Kaipio
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Role of soft bone, CSF and gray matter in EEG simulations.

Authors:  Ceon Ramon; P Schimpf; J Haueisen; M Holmes; A Ishimaru
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Influence of skull modeling approaches on EEG source localization.

Authors:  Victoria Montes-Restrepo; Pieter van Mierlo; Gregor Strobbe; Steven Staelens; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Hans Hallez
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Subject position affects EEG magnitudes.

Authors:  Justin K Rice; Christopher Rorden; Jessica S Little; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.

Authors:  S Wagner; F Lucka; J Vorwerk; C S Herrmann; G Nolte; M Burger; C H Wolters
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.

Authors:  Marios Antonakakis; Sophie Schrader; Ümit Aydin; Asad Khan; Joachim Gross; Michalis Zervakis; Stefan Rampp; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3D-MR tomography.

Authors:  H Buchner; M Fuchs; H A Wischmann; O Dössel; I Ludwig; A Knepper; P Berg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Arent de Jongh; Jan Casper de Munck; Sónia I Gonçalves; Pauly Ossenblok
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Correlation between structure and resistivity variations of the live human skull.

Authors:  Chi Tang; Fusheng You; Guang Cheng; Dakuan Gao; Feng Fu; Guosheng Yang; Xiuzhen Dong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Simanto Saha; Khondaker A Mamun; Khawza Ahmed; Raqibul Mostafa; Ganesh R Naik; Sam Darvishi; Ahsan H Khandoker; Mathias Baumert
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Modality-specific tracking of attention and sensory statistics in the human electrophysiological spectral exponent.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Jonas Obleser; Leonhard Waschke; Thomas Donoghue; Lorenz Fiedler; Sydney Smith; Douglas D Garrett
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Methodological considerations for studying neural oscillations.

Authors:  Thomas Donoghue; Natalie Schaworonkow; Bradley Voytek
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.698

4.  Effects of the antibiotic rifaximin on cortical functional connectivity are mediated through insular cortex.

Authors:  Davide Sometti; Chiara Ballan; Huiying Wang; Christoph Braun; Paul Enck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Human electromagnetic and haemodynamic networks systematically converge in unimodal cortex and diverge in transmodal cortex.

Authors:  Golia Shafiei; Sylvain Baillet; Bratislav Misic
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 9.593

6.  Effective Connectivity in Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Radha Kumari; Mohammed Jarjees; Ioana Susnoschi-Luca; Mariel Purcell; Aleksandra Vučković
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Validating EEG, MEG and Combined MEG and EEG Beamforming for an Estimation of the Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Cortical Dysplasia.

Authors:  Frank Neugebauer; Marios Antonakakis; Kanjana Unnwongse; Yaroslav Parpaley; Jörg Wellmer; Stefan Rampp; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-14

8.  Directionality of the injected current targeting the P20/N20 source determines the efficacy of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-induced aftereffects in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mohd Faizal Mohd Zulkifly; Albert Lehr; Daniel van de Velden; Asad Khan; Niels K Focke; Carsten H Wolters; Walter Paulus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.

Authors:  Maria Carla Piastra; Andreas Nüßing; Johannes Vorwerk; Maureen Clerc; Christian Engwer; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.399

10.  Optimal design of on-scalp electromagnetic sensor arrays for brain source localisation.

Authors:  Leandro Beltrachini; Nicolas von Ellenrieder; Roland Eichardt; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.