Literature DB >> 32919058

Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.

Marios Antonakakis1, Sophie Schrader2, Ümit Aydin3, Asad Khan2, Joachim Gross4, Michalis Zervakis5, Stefan Rampp6, Carsten H Wolters7.   

Abstract

Skull conductivity has a substantial influence on EEG and combined EEG and MEG source analysis as well as on optimized transcranial electric stimulation. To overcome the use of standard literature values, we propose a non-invasive two-level calibration procedure to estimate skull conductivity individually in a group study with twenty healthy adults. Our procedure requires only an additional run of combined somatosensory evoked potential and field data, which can be easily integrated in EEG/MEG experiments. The calibration procedure uses the P20/N20 topographies and subject-specific realistic head models from MRI. We investigate the inter-subject variability of skull conductivity and relate it to skull thickness, age and gender of the subjects, to the individual scalp P20/N20 surface distance between the P20 potential peak and the N20 potential trough as well as to the individual source depth of the P20/N20 source. We found a considerable inter-subject variability for (calibrated) skull conductivity (8.44 ± 4.84 mS/m) and skull thickness (5.97 ± 1.19 mm) with a statistically significant correlation between them (rho = 0.52). Age showed a statistically significant negative correlation with skull conductivity (rho = -0.5). Furthermore, P20/N20 surface distance and source depth showed large inter-subject variability of 12.08 ± 3.21 cm and 15.45 ± 4.54 mm, respectively, but there was no significant correlation between them. We also found no significant differences among gender subgroups for the investigated measures. It is thus important to take the inter-subject variability of skull conductivity and thickness into account by means of using subject-specific calibrated realistic head modeling.
Copyright © 2020 University Hospital of Münster. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calibrated Realistic Head Model; EEG/MEG Source Analysis; Skull Conductivity; Skull Thickness; Somatosensory evoked responses; Transcranial Electric Stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919058     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  A novel technique for accurate electrode placement over cortical targets for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) clinical trials.

Authors:  Mayank Jog; Cole Anderson; Elizabeth Kim; Avery Garrett; Antoni Kubicki; Sara Gonzalez; Kay Jann; Marco Iacoboni; Roger Woods; Danny Jj Wang; Katherine L Narr
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Fostering eating after stroke (FEASt) trial for improving post-stroke dysphagia with non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Sarah Marchina; Susan Langmore; Joseph Massaro; Joseph Palmisano; Na Wang; David Eric Searls; Vasileios Lioutas; Jessica Pisegna; Cynthia Wagner; Anant Shinde; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Developmental Effects on Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials Characterized by Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Carlyn Patterson Gentile; Nabin R Joshi; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Kristy B Arbogast; Christina Master; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Validating EEG, MEG and Combined MEG and EEG Beamforming for an Estimation of the Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Cortical Dysplasia.

Authors:  Frank Neugebauer; Marios Antonakakis; Kanjana Unnwongse; Yaroslav Parpaley; Jörg Wellmer; Stefan Rampp; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Numerical uncertainty in analytical pipelines lead to impactful variability in brain networks.

Authors:  Gregory Kiar; Yohan Chatelain; Pablo de Oliveira Castro; Eric Petit; Ariel Rokem; Gaël Varoquaux; Bratislav Misic; Alan C Evans; Tristan Glatard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Directionality of the injected current targeting the P20/N20 source determines the efficacy of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-induced aftereffects in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mohd Faizal Mohd Zulkifly; Albert Lehr; Daniel van de Velden; Asad Khan; Niels K Focke; Carsten H Wolters; Walter Paulus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.

Authors:  Maria Carla Piastra; Andreas Nüßing; Johannes Vorwerk; Maureen Clerc; Christian Engwer; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.399

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.