Literature DB >> 11182578

Effects of electrode properties on EEG measurements and a related inverse problem.

J O Ollikainen1, M Vauhkonen, P A Karjalainen, J P Kaipio.   

Abstract

A trend in EEG measurements is to increase the number of measurement electrodes in order to improve the spatial resolution of the recorded voltage distribution at the scalp. It is assumed that this would implicate better accuracy in the EEG inverse estimates. However, this does not necessarily hold. The reason for this is that the electrodes create a well conducting shunting "layer" on the scalp which affects the voltage distribution. This may decrease the information obtained and may therefore worsen the inverse estimates. Electrodes in EEG inverse problems are commonly modeled as point electrodes. This model cannot take into account the possible shunting effect of the electrodes. In this study the measurement electrodes are modeled using the so-called complete electrode model which takes into account the actual size of the electrode, the contact impedance between the skin and the electrode and also the shunting effect of the electrodes. In this paper the effects of the electrode size and the contact impedance on the voltage distribution are studied by simulations. It is shown that, depending on the size and the contact impedance of the electrodes, increasing the number of electrodes does not necessarily improve the accuracy of the inverse estimates. We also conclude that the use of the point electrode model is quite adequate in normal EEG studies. The use of a complete electrode model is necessary if electrodes cover more than 50% of the surface area.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11182578     DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(00)00070-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  10 in total

1.  Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG.

Authors:  S Pursiainen; S Lew; C H Wolters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Dry EEG electrodes.

Authors:  M A Lopez-Gordo; D Sanchez-Morillo; F Pelayo Valle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Human motor cortical activity recorded with Micro-ECoG electrodes, during individual finger movements.

Authors:  W Wang; A D Degenhart; J L Collinger; R Vinjamuri; G P Sudre; P D Adelson; D L Holder; E C Leuthardt; D W Moran; M L Boninger; A B Schwartz; D J Crammond; E C Tyler-Kabara; D J Weber
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

4.  The influence of age and skull conductivity on surface and subdermal bipolar EEG leads.

Authors:  Katrina Wendel; Juho Väisänen; Gunnar Seemann; Jari Hyttinen; Jaakko Malmivuo
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-10

5.  Fast detection and data compensation for electrodes disconnection in long-term monitoring of dynamic brain electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Ge Zhang; Meng Dai; Lin Yang; Weichen Li; Haoting Li; Canhua Xu; Xuetao Shi; Xiuzhen Dong; Feng Fu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  An on-line processing strategy for head movement interferences removal of dynamic brain electrical impedance tomography based on wavelet decomposition.

Authors:  Ge Zhang; Weichen Li; Hang Ma; Xuechao Liu; Meng Dai; Canhua Xu; Haoting Li; Xiuzhen Dong; Xingwang Sun; Feng Fu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Impact of Brain Surface Boundary Conditions on Electrophysiology and Implications for Electrocorticography.

Authors:  Nicholas Rogers; Martin Thunemann; Anna Devor; Vikash Gilja
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  FEMfuns: A Volume Conduction Modeling Pipeline that Includes Resistive, Capacitive or Dispersive Tissue and Electrodes.

Authors:  M Vermaas; M C Piastra; T F Oostendorp; N F Ramsey; P H E Tiesinga
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-10

9.  Consequences of EEG electrode position error on ultimate beamformer source reconstruction performance.

Authors:  Sarang S Dalal; Stefan Rampp; Florian Willomitzer; Svenja Ettl
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.

Authors:  Maria Carla Piastra; Andreas Nüßing; Johannes Vorwerk; Maureen Clerc; Christian Engwer; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.399

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.