| Literature DB >> 33114659 |
Franca Barbic1,2, Maura Minonzio1, Beatrice Cairo3, Dana Shiffer1, Antonio Roberto Zamuner4, Silvia Cavalieri5, Franca Dipaola1,2, Nicola Magnavita5,6, Alberto Porta3,7, Raffaello Furlan1,2.
Abstract
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) negatively impacts quality of life. The excessive increase in cardiac sympathetic modulation during standing, which characterizes POTS patients, leads to many symptoms and signs of orthostatic intolerance. Little is known about the consequences of the disease on work performance and its relationship with individual autonomic profiles. Twenty-two POTS patients regularly engaged in working activity (20 females, age 36 ± 12 years) and 18 gender- and age-matched controls underwent a clinical evaluation and filled out the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire. POTS patients completed the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS31) questionnaire, underwent continuous electrocardiogram, blood pressure and respiratory activity recordings while supine and during a 75° head-up tilt (HUT). A power spectrum analysis provided the index of cardiac sympatho-vagal balance (LF/HF). WAI scores were significantly reduced in POTS patients (29.84 ± 1.40) compared to controls (45.63 ± 0.53, p < 0.01). A significant inverse correlation was found between individual WAI and COMPASS31 scores (r = -0.46; p = 0.03), HUT increase in heart rate (r = -0.57; p = 0.01) and LF/HF (r = -0.55; p = 0.01). In POTS patients, the WAI scores were inversely correlated to the intensity of autonomic symptoms and to the excessive cardiac sympathetic activation induced by the gravitational stimulus.Entities:
Keywords: arterial pressure; autonomic nervous system; baroreflex; head-up tilt; heart rate variability; spectral analysis; work ability
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33114659 PMCID: PMC7662324 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) patients and Controls.
| Demographics and Clinical Characteristics | POTS Patients | Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36 ± 2 | 39 ± 3 |
| Sex (Male/Female) | 2/20 | 4/14 |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 21.2 ± 0.7 | 21.9 ± 1.0 |
| Total WAI score | 29.8 ± 1.4 | 45.6 ± 0.5 * |
| Coexisting diseases, | 22 (100) | 7 (39) * |
| Cardiovascular | 7 (32) | - |
| Musculoskeletal | 17 (77) | 2 (11) |
| Gastrointestinal | 13 (59) | - |
| Nervous System | 11 (50) | - |
| Ehlers-Danlos syndrome | 5 (23) | - |
| Fibromyalgia | 3 (14) | - |
| Other | 19 (86) | 6 (27) |
| Drug assumption, | 20 (91) | 2 (11) * |
WAI indicates the Work Ability Index. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. * p < 0.01 POTS vs. controls. Note that the subset of participants had several diseases, and total numbers of participants when adding for each disease does not match with the total numbers of coexisting diseases.
The seven items explored by the Work Ability Index (WAI) and the total WAI score in POTS patients and controls.
| Work Ability Domains | POTS Patients | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current work ability compared to the lifetime best (0–10) | 5.68 ± 0.39 | 9.06 ± 0.22 | |
| Work ability in relation to the job demands (2–10) | 6.73 ± 0.32 | 9.44 ± 0.22 | |
| Current diseases diagnosed (1–7) | 2.68 ± 0.31 | 6.50 ± 0.17 | |
| Estimated work impairment (1–6) | 3.50 ± 0.22 | 5.89 ± 0.08 | |
| Sick leave in the last year due to the diseases (1–5) | 2.98 ± 0.24 | 4.28 ± 0.11 | |
| Own prognosis of work ability two years from now (1,4,7) | 5.91 ± 0.37 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | |
| Mental resources (1–4) | 2.36 ± 0.18 | 3.46 ± 0.10 | |
| Total WAI score | 29.84 ± 1.40 | 45.63 ± 0.53 |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Figure 1Individual values of autonomic symptoms intensity for the six domains explored by the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS31) questionnaire and the total COMPASS31 score. Each symbol in the graphs (i.e., *, x, Δ, …) represents the single POTS patient. The full black circles indicate the mean values of the scores with standard error bars.
Indices of cardiac and vascular autonomic profile of POTS patients (n = 19) while supine and during 75° head-up tilt (HUT).
| Parameter | SUPINE | HUT |
|---|---|---|
| RR (ms) | 806 ± 30 | 611 ± 20 * |
| HR (beats/min) | 75 ± 3 | 107 ± 3 * |
| RRvar (ms2) | 2582 ± 746 | 803 ± 139 * |
| LFRR (ms2) | 810.0 ± 227.7 | 337.4 ± 88.9 * |
| LFRR (n.u.) | 61.1 ± 5.5 | 78.2 ± 3.1 * |
| HFRR (ms2) | 961.8 ± 424.7 | 64.3 ± 22.0 * |
| HFRR (n.u.) | 36.2 ± 5.5 | 15.2 ± 2.9 * |
| LF/HF | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 11.7 ± 2.8 * |
| SAP (mmHg) | 108 ± 3 | 110 ± 3 |
| DAP (mmHg) | 66 ± 2 | 71 ± 2 * |
| LFSAP (mmHg2) | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 12.0 ± 2.6 * |
| RESP (cycles/min) | 17.3 ± 0.5 | 16.9 ± 0.7 |
| αLF (ms/mmHg) | 21.3 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 0.9 * |
| NE (ng/L) | 252.1 ± 32.3 | 522.0 ± 71.4 * |
| E (ng/L) | 27.4 ± 3.7 | 51.3 ± 7.6 * |
RR indicates R-R interval; HR, Heart Rate; RRvar, RR variance; LFRR, low frequency power of RR variability; HFRR, high frequency power of RR variability; n.u., normalized units; LF/HF, ratio of the LF power to the HF one of RR series; SAP, Systolic Arterial Pressure; DAP, Diastolic Arterial Pressure; LFSAP, low frequency power of SAP variability; RESP, respiration rate; αLF, index of arterial baroreceptor sensitivity assessed by bivariate power spectrum analysis; NE, plasmatic norepinephrine; E, plasmatic epinephrine. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. * p < 0.05 SUPINE vs. HUT.
Figure 2Relationships between the individual total COMPASS31 scores and the Work Ability Index (WAI) in POTS patients; r indicates the correlation coefficient, r2 indicates the goodness of fit and the dashed lines represent the 95% of confidence intervals. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Notice that the higher the Total COMPASS31 score the lower the WAI score.
Figure 3Relationships between the individual changes induced by 75° head-up tilt of heart rate (HR), the marker of cardiac sympatho-vagal modulation (LF/HF) (upper panels), systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and the marker of vascular sympathetic modulation (LFSAP) (bottom panels) and the Work Ability Index (WAI) in POTS patients; r indicates the correlation coefficient, r2 indicates the goodness of fit and the dashed lines represent the 95% of confidence intervals. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Notice that the higher the increase in HR (∆HR, upper left panel) and LF/HF (∆LF/HF, upper right panel), the lower the WAI score.
Figure 4Relationships between the individual changes induced by 75° head-up tilt on Norepinephrine (NE) and Epinephrine (E) plasma values and the Work Ability Index (WAI) score in POTS patients; r indicates the correlation coefficient, r2 indicates the goodness of fit, the dashed lines represent the 95% of confidence intervals. Notice that a mild, non-significant relationship is present between the increase in NE induced by the HUT (∆NE) and the WAI score, while the increase in epinephrine induced by tilt (∆E) results unrelated with the WAI score of the POTS patients.