Literature DB >> 12091582

Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire.

B C H de Zwart1, M H W Frings-Dresen, J C van Duivenbooden.   

Abstract

The goal of the study was to assess the test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire. Reliability was tested using a test-retest design with a 4 week interval between measurements. Valid data were collected among 97 elderly construction workers aged 40 years and older. We analysed the test-retest reliability of the WAI score itself (range 7-49 points) and classification in one of the four WAI categories based on this score: poor (7-27 points); moderate (28-36 points); good (37-43 points); and excellent work ability (44-49 points). Exactly the same WAI score on both measurements was reported by 25% of the subjects and 95% of the individual differences between measurements were found to be <6.86 points (two times standard deviation). Despite the individual changes between measurements, no significant difference was reported in the mean WAI score at group level between test and retest measurements (40.4 versus 39.9). The percentage of observed agreement for the classification of subjects in one of the four WAI categories on both measurements equalled 66%. The results of this study provided evidence of an acceptable test-retest reliability of the classification of subject's work ability by means of the WAI questionnaire. At group level, the mean WAI score and classification into WAI categories were found to be a stable measure over a 4 week interval. These results give additional support for the applicability of the questionnaire in occupational health research and the daily practice of occupational health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091582     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/52.4.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  116 in total

1.  Adverse effects of effort-reward imbalance on work ability: longitudinal findings from the German Sociomedical Panel of Employees.

Authors:  Matthias Bethge; Friedrich Michael Radoschewski
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  An occupational health intervention programme for workers at risk for early retirement; a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A G E M de Boer; J-C van Beek; J Durinck; J H A M Verbeek; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors?

Authors:  Auli Airila; Jari Hakanen; Anne Punakallio; Sirpa Lusa; Ritva Luukkonen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  The psychometric properties of an Iranian translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire.

Authors:  M Abdolalizadeh; A A Arastoo; R Ghsemzadeh; A Montazeri; K Ahmadi; A Azizi
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

5.  Functional, postural and perceived balance for predicting the work ability of firefighters.

Authors:  Anne Punakallio; Sirpa Lusa; Ritva Luukkonen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Factors associated with changes in perceived strain at work among fire-fighters: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Sirpa Lusa; Anne Punakallio; Ritva Luukkonen; Veikko Louhevaara
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  The effect of individual counselling and education on work ability and disability pension: a prospective intervention study in the construction industry.

Authors:  A G E M de Boer; A Burdorf; C van Duivenbooden; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Symptomatology of recurrent low back pain in nursing and administrative professions.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Thomas Läubli; Juerg Hodler; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Measurement properties of the Work Limitations Questionnaire were sufficient among cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sietske J Tamminga; Jos H A M Verbeek; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Angela G E M De Boer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The effect of self-management education following mild stroke: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Timothy J Wolf; Meredith J Spiers; Meghan Doherty; Emily V Leary
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.