BACKGROUND: Community-based studies of influenza and other respiratory viruses (eg, SARS-CoV-2) require laboratory confirmation of infection. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing guidelines require alternative data collection in order to protect both research staff and participants. Home-collected respiratory specimens are less resource-intensive, can be collected earlier after symptom onset, and provide a low-contact means of data collection. A prospective, multi-year, community-based cohort study is an ideal setting to examine the utility of home-collected specimens for identification of influenza. METHODS: We describe the feasibility and reliability of home-collected specimens for the detection of influenza. We collected data and specimens between October 2014 and June 2017 from the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation (HIVE) Study. Cohort participants were asked to collect a nasal swab at home upon onset of acute respiratory illness. Research staff also collected nose and throat swab specimens in the study clinic within 7 days of onset. We estimated agreement using Cohen's kappa and calculated sensitivity and specificity of home-collected compared to staff-collected specimens. RESULTS: We tested 336 paired staff- and home-collected respiratory specimens for influenza by RT-PCR; 150 staff-collected specimens were positive for influenza A/H3N2, 23 for influenza A/H1N1, 14 for influenza B/Victoria, and 31 for influenza B/Yamagata. We found moderate agreement between collection methods for influenza A/H3N2 (0.70) and B/Yamagata (0.69) and high agreement for influenza A/H1N1 (0.87) and B/Victoria (0.86). Sensitivity ranged from 78% to 86% for all influenza types and subtypes. Specificity was high for influenza A/H1N1 and both influenza B lineages with a range from 96% to 100%, and slightly lower for A/H3N2 infections (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Collection of nasal swab specimens at home is both feasible and reliable for identification of influenza virus infections.
BACKGROUND: Community-based studies of influenza and other respiratory viruses (eg, SARS-CoV-2) require laboratory confirmation of infection. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing guidelines require alternative data collection in order to protect both research staff and participants. Home-collected respiratory specimens are less resource-intensive, can be collected earlier after symptom onset, and provide a low-contact means of data collection. A prospective, multi-year, community-based cohort study is an ideal setting to examine the utility of home-collected specimens for identification of influenza. METHODS: We describe the feasibility and reliability of home-collected specimens for the detection of influenza. We collected data and specimens between October 2014 and June 2017 from the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation (HIVE) Study. Cohort participants were asked to collect a nasal swab at home upon onset of acute respiratory illness. Research staff also collected nose and throat swab specimens in the study clinic within 7 days of onset. We estimated agreement using Cohen's kappa and calculated sensitivity and specificity of home-collected compared to staff-collected specimens. RESULTS: We tested 336 paired staff- and home-collected respiratory specimens for influenza by RT-PCR; 150 staff-collected specimens were positive for influenza A/H3N2, 23 for influenza A/H1N1, 14 for influenza B/Victoria, and 31 for influenza B/Yamagata. We found moderate agreement between collection methods for influenza A/H3N2 (0.70) and B/Yamagata (0.69) and high agreement for influenza A/H1N1 (0.87) and B/Victoria (0.86). Sensitivity ranged from 78% to 86% for all influenza types and subtypes. Specificity was high for influenza A/H1N1 and both influenza B lineages with a range from 96% to 100%, and slightly lower for A/H3N2 infections (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Collection of nasal swab specimens at home is both feasible and reliable for identification of influenza virus infections.
Authors: Marek Smieja; Santina Castriciano; Susan Carruthers; Geoffrey So; Sylvia Chong; Kathy Luinstra; James B Mahony; Astrid Petrich; Max Chernesky; Mario Savarese; Daniele Triva Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Sarah Spencer; Jessie Chung; Mark Thompson; Pedro A Piedra; Alan Jewell; Vasanthi Avadhanula; Minghua Mei; Michael L Jackson; Jennifer Meece; Maria Sundaram; Edward A Belongia; Rachel Cross; Emileigh Johnson; Arlene Bullotta; Charles Rinaldo; Manjusha Gaglani; Kempapura Murthy; Lydia Clipper; LaShondra Berman; Brendan Flannery Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: Michael L Jackson; Jessie R Chung; Lisa A Jackson; C Hallie Phillips; Joyce Benoit; Arnold S Monto; Emily T Martin; Edward A Belongia; Huong Q McLean; Manjusha Gaglani; Kempapura Murthy; Richard Zimmerman; Mary P Nowalk; Alicia M Fry; Brendan Flannery Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Oscar E Larios; Brenda L Coleman; Steven J Drews; Tony Mazzulli; Bjug Borgundvaag; Karen Green; Allison J McGeer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dennis K M Ip; Martin Schutten; Vicky J Fang; Rita O P Fung; Regina T Dutkowski; Kwok-Hung Chan; Gabriel M Leung; J S Malik Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Michele D Tisdale; David R Tribble; Indrani Mitra; Kalyani Telu; Huai-Ching Kuo; Jamie A Fraser; Jie Liu; Eric R Houpt; Mark S Riddle; Drake H Tilley; Anjali N Kunz; Heather C Yun; Charla C Geist; Tahaniyat Lalani Journal: J Travel Med Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 39.194
Authors: Emily J Ciccone; Paul N Zivich; Evans K Lodge; Deanna Zhu; Elle Law; Elyse Miller; Jasmine L Taylor; Suemin Chung; Jason Xu; Alexander Volfovsky; Cherese Beatty; Haley Abernathy; Elise King; Haley E Garrett; Alena J Markmann; Meghan E Rebuli; Subhashini Sellers; David J Weber; Raquel Reyes; Naseem Alavian; Jonathan J Juliano; Ross M Boyce; Allison E Aiello Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-04-30
Authors: Ana A Weil; Kyle G Luiten; Amanda M Casto; Julia C Bennett; Jessica O'Hanlon; Peter D Han; Luis S Gamboa; Evan McDermot; Melissa Truong; Geoffrey S Gottlieb; Zack Acker; Caitlin R Wolf; Ariana Magedson; Eric J Chow; Natalie K Lo; Lincoln C Pothan; Devon McDonald; Tessa C Wright; Kathryn M McCaffrey; Marlin D Figgins; Janet A Englund; Michael Boeckh; Christina M Lockwood; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure; Trevor Bedford; James P Hughes; Lea M Starita; Helen Y Chu Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Ryan E Malosh; Joshua G Petrie; Amy P Callear; Arnold S Monto; Emily T Martin Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 5.606