Literature DB >> 33100508

Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.

Trevor Brothers1,2, Gina R Kuperberg1,2.   

Abstract

During language comprehension, we routinely use information from the prior context to help identify the meaning of individual words. While measures of online processing difficulty, such as reading times, are strongly influenced by contextual predictability, there is disagreement about the mechanisms underlying this lexical predictability effect, with different models predicting different linking functions - linear (Reichle, Rayner & Pollatsek, 2003) or logarithmic (Levy, 2008). To help resolve this debate, we conducted two highly-powered experiments (self-paced reading, N = 216; cross-modal picture naming, N = 36), and a meta-analysis of prior eye-tracking while reading studies (total N = 218). We observed a robust linear relationship between lexical predictability and word processing times across all three studies. Beyond their methodological implications, these findings also place important constraints on predictive processing models of language comprehension. In particular, these results directly contradict the empirical predictions of surprisal theory, while supporting a proportional pre-activation account of lexical prediction effects in comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  information theory; language comprehension; prediction; psycholinguistics; reading

Year:  2020        PMID: 33100508      PMCID: PMC7584137          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  49 in total

1.  The metabolic cost of neural information.

Authors:  S B Laughlin; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck; J C Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Hongoak Yun; Jean-Pierre Koenig; Gail Mauner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-12-23

Review 3.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Keith Rayner; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter; J D Woolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-06

10.  Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Elin Runnqvist; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension.

Authors:  Micha Heilbron; Kristijan Armeni; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Peter Hagoort; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 2.  Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.

Authors:  Shruti Dave; Trevor Brothers; Liv J Hoversten; Matthew J Traxler; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.610

3.  Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.

Authors:  Markus J Hofmann; Steffen Remus; Chris Biemann; Ralph Radach; Lars Kuchinke
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Semantic feature activation takes time: longer SOA elicits earlier priming effects during reading.

Authors:  Markus J Hofmann; Mareike A Kleemann; André Roelke-Wellmann; Christian Vorstius; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 5.  Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-10-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.