Literature DB >> 25917550

Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Daniel Kleinman1, Elin Runnqvist2, Victor S Ferreira3.   

Abstract

Comprehenders predict upcoming speech and text on the basis of linguistic input. How many predictions do comprehenders make for an upcoming word? If a listener strongly expects to hear the word "sock", is the word "shirt" partially expected as well, is it actively inhibited, or is it ignored? The present research addressed these questions by measuring the "downstream" effects of prediction on the processing of subsequently presented stimuli using the cumulative semantic interference paradigm. In three experiments, subjects named pictures (sock) that were presented either in isolation or after strongly constraining sentence frames ("After doing his laundry, Mark always seemed to be missing one…"). Naming sock slowed the subsequent naming of the picture shirt - the standard cumulative semantic interference effect. However, although picture naming was much faster after sentence frames, the interference effect was not modulated by the context (bare vs. sentence) in which either picture was presented. According to the only model of cumulative semantic interference that can account for such a pattern of data, this indicates that comprehenders pre-activated and maintained the pre-activation of best sentence completions (sock) but did not maintain the pre-activation of less likely completions (shirt). Thus, comprehenders predicted only the most probable completion for each sentence.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prediction; Semantic interference; Sentence comprehension; Speech production; Word retrieval

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917550      PMCID: PMC4457568          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Timed picture naming in seven languages.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Simona D'Amico; Thomas Jacobsen; Anna Székely; Elena Andonova; Antonella Devescovi; Dan Herron; Ching Ching Lu; Thomas Pechmann; Csaba Pléh; Nicole Wicha; Kara Federmeier; Irini Gerdjikova; Gabriel Gutierrez; Daisy Hung; Jeanne Hsu; Gowri Iyer; Katherine Kohnert; Teodora Mehotcheva; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Angela Tzeng; Ovid Tzeng
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.

Authors:  A Roelofs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

5.  Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-08

6.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  On the origin of the "cumulative semantic inhibition" effect.

Authors:  F-Xavier Alario; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Facilitation and interference in naming: A consequence of the same learning process?

Authors:  Julie W Hughes; Tatiana T Schnur
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-05-11

2.  Verbal and Nonverbal Anticipatory Mechanisms in Bilinguals.

Authors:  Lorenzo Desideri; Paola Bonifacci
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

3.  Differences in Prediction May Underlie Language Disorder in Autism.

Authors:  Susan Ellis Weismer; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Effects of Bilingualism on Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Measures in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Mónica Rosselli; David A Loewenstein; Rosie E Curiel; Ailyn Penate; Valeria L Torres; Merike Lang; Maria T Greig; William W Barker; Ranjan Duara
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.

Authors:  Anne L Beatty-Martínez; Michelle R Bruni; María Teresa Bajo; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.348

7.  Relationships between alpha oscillations during speech preparation and the listener N400 ERP to the produced speech.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Sarah Henderson; Marieke Sorge; Sergey Plis; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Error-based learning and lexical competition in word production: Evidence from multilingual naming.

Authors:  Elin Runnqvist; Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon; Anna Lorenzoni; Francesca Peressotti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  Lingering expectations: A pseudo-repetition effect for words previously expected but not presented.

Authors:  Joost Rommers; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.