Literature DB >> 16007080

Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Katherine A DeLong1, Thomas P Urbach, Marta Kutas.   

Abstract

Despite the numerous examples of anticipatory cognitive processes at micro and macro levels in many animal species, the idea that anticipation of specific words plays an integral role in real-time language processing has been contentious. Here we exploited a phonological regularity of English indefinite articles ('an' precedes nouns beginning with vowel sounds, whereas 'a' precedes nouns beginning with consonant sounds) in combination with event-related brain potential recordings from the human scalp to show that readers' brains can pre-activate individual words in a graded fashion to a degree that can be estimated from the probability that each word is given as a continuation for a sentence fragment offline. These findings are evidence that readers use the words in a sentence (as cues to their world knowledge) to estimate relative likelihoods for upcoming words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16007080     DOI: 10.1038/nn1504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  221 in total

1.  Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Tracy Chow; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Christoph Scheepers; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; David M Groppe; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

4.  Association of abnormal semantic processing with delusion-like ideation in frequent cannabis users: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Michael Kiang; Bruce K Christensen; David L Streiner; Carolyn Roy; Iulia Patriciu; Robert B Zipursky
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas; Rina Schul
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Cross-modal prediction in speech depends on prior linguistic experience.

Authors:  Carolina Sánchez-García; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Rule-based and Word-level Statistics-based Processing of Language: Insights from Neuroscience.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Lucia Melloni; Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.