Literature DB >> 6213735

Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

M A Just, P A Carpenter, J D Woolley.   

Abstract

This article compares several methods of presenting text, including a new paradigm that produces reading-time data with many of the characteristics of naturally occurring eye-fixation data. In the new paradigm, called the moving window condition, a reader presses a button to see each successive work in a text, and the previous work is removed when a new work appears. The words appear in the same position that they would in normal test, and word-length information is available in peripheral vision. The results are qualitatively and quantitatively compared to the results obtained by monitoring the eye fixations of subjects reading normal text. The word-level effects are generally similar. Readers pause longer on longer words, on less frequent words, on words that introduce a new topic, and at ends of sentences. The results suggest that readers initiate thr processing of each word as soon as they encounter it rather than buffer words and delay processing. Also considered are two other reading-time paradigms, one in which words are cumulatively displayed on the screen and one in which each successive word is presented at the same location on the screen. Finally, we consider how the tendency to immediately process text might interact with other techniques for text presentation, such as the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) condition, and we generate predictions about the nature and limits of the method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6213735     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.2.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  138 in total

1.  Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish.

Authors:  E Gibson; N J Pearlmutter; V Torrens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  The concomitant effects of phrase length and informational content in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  R Thornton; M C MacDonald; J E Arnold
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

3.  The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  H Vu; G Kellas; K Metcalf; R Herman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

4.  Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening.

Authors:  D Titone; K J Prentice; A Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

5.  Cognitive Constraints and Island Effects.

Authors:  Philip Hofmeister; Ivan A Sag
Journal:  Language (Baltim)       Date:  2010-06

6.  Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Tracy Chow; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Christoph Scheepers; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Word order in sentence processing: an experimental study of verb placement in German.

Authors:  Helga Weyerts; Martina Penke; Thomas F Münte; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Harald Clahsen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-05

8.  Feature integration that routinely occurs without focal attention.

Authors:  M Kubovy; D J Cohen; J Hollier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

9.  The effects of age and domain knowledge on text processing.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.