Literature DB >> 22019481

Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Cyma Van Petten1, Barbara J Luka.   

Abstract

Because context has a robust influence on the processing of subsequent words, the idea that readers and listeners predict upcoming words has attracted research attention, but prediction has fallen in and out of favor as a likely factor in normal comprehension. We note that the common sense of this word includes both benefits for confirmed predictions and costs for disconfirmed predictions. The N400 component of the event-related potential (ERP) reliably indexes the benefits of semantic context. Evidence that the N400 is sensitive to the other half of prediction--a cost for failure--is largely absent from the literature. This raises the possibility that "prediction" is not a good description of what comprehenders do. However, it need not be the case that the benefits and costs of prediction are evident in a single ERP component. Research outside of language processing indicates that late positive components of the ERP are very sensitive to disconfirmed predictions. We review late positive components elicited by words that are potentially more or less predictable from preceding sentence context. This survey suggests that late positive responses to unexpected words are fairly common, but that these consist of two distinct components with different scalp topographies, one associated with semantically incongruent words and one associated with congruent words. We conclude with a discussion of the possible cognitive correlates of these distinct late positivities and their relationships with more thoroughly characterized ERP components, namely the P300, P600 response to syntactic errors, and the "old/new effect" in studies of recognition memory. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019481     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  146 in total

1.  How the speed of working memory updating influences the on-line thematic processing of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Li; Yuan-Yuan Zheng; Hai-Yan Zhao; Jin-Yan Xia
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts.

Authors:  Yen Na Yum; Sam-Po Law; Kwan Nok Mo; Dustin Lau; I-Fan Su; Mark S K Shum
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Laura Quante; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Spatiotemporal Signatures of Lexical-Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Kirsten Weber; Alexandre Gramfort; Matti S Hämäläinen; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Elin Runnqvist; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Ming Xiang; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.