Literature DB >> 34407219

Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Vincent Favaudon1, Rudi Labarbe2, Charles L Limoli3.   

Abstract

Current radiotherapy facilities are standardized to deliver dose rates around 0.1-0.4 Gy/s in 2 Gy daily fractions, designed to deliver total accumulated doses to reach the tolerance limit of normal tissues undergoing irradiation. FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), on the other hand, relies on facilities capable of delivering ultrahigh dose rates in large doses in a single microsecond pulse, or in a few pulses given over a very short time sequence. For example, most studies to date have implemented 4-6 MeV electrons with intra-pulse dose rates in the range 106 -107  Gy/s. The proposed dependence of the FLASH effect on oxygen tension has stimulated several theoretical models based on three different hypotheses: (i) Radiation-induced transient oxygen depletion; (ii) cell-specific differences in the ability to detoxify and/or recover from injury caused by reactive oxygen species; (iii) self-annihilation of radicals by bimolecular recombination. This article focuses on the observations supporting or refuting these models in the frame of the chemical-biological bases of the impact of oxygen on the radiation response of cell free, in vitro and in vivo model systems.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FLASH radiotherapy; oxygen; peroxyl radicals; radical recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34407219      PMCID: PMC8854455          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  81 in total

1.  A computational model of radiolytic oxygen depletion during FLASH irradiation and its effect on the oxygen enhancement ratio.

Authors:  Guillem Pratx; Daniel S Kapp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Oxy-radicals and related species: their formation, lifetimes, and reactions.

Authors:  W A Pryor
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  Survival of mammalian cells exposed to x rays at ultra-high dose-rates.

Authors:  R J Berry; E J Hall; D W Forster; T H Storr; M J Goodman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Bringing FLASH to the Clinic: Treatment Planning Considerations for Ultrahigh Dose-Rate Proton Beams.

Authors:  Patricia van Marlen; Max Dahele; Michael Folkerts; Eric Abel; Berend J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Radiation effects on membranes. III. The effect of X irradiation on survival of mammalian cells substituted by polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Authors:  H Wolters; A W Konings
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Oxidatively generated complex DNA damage: tandem and clustered lesions.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Jean-Luc Ravanat; Marisa TavernaPorro; Hervé Menoni; Dimitar Angelov
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Characterization and mechanism of formation of tandem lesions in DNA by a nucleobase peroxyl radical.

Authors:  In Seok Hong; K Nolan Carter; Kousuke Sato; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Charles L Limoli; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Benoît Petit; Ioannis G Petridis; Philippe Fuchs; Ron Leavitt; Kristoffer Petersson; Maude Gondré; Jonathan Ollivier; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Jean-François Germond
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 13.801

9.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Kristoffer Petersson; Gabriel Adrian; Karl Butterworth; Stephen J McMahon
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 8.013

10.  Direct measurement of local oxygen concentration in the bone marrow of live animals.

Authors:  Joel A Spencer; Francesca Ferraro; Emmanuel Roussakis; Alyssa Klein; Juwell Wu; Judith M Runnels; Walid Zaher; Luke J Mortensen; Clemens Alt; Raphaël Turcotte; Rushdia Yusuf; Daniel Côté; Sergei A Vinogradov; David T Scadden; Charles P Lin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mitochondrial Damage Response and Fate of Normal Cells Exposed to FLASH Irradiation with Protons.

Authors:  Ziyang Guo; Manuela Buonanno; Andrew Harken; Guangming Zhou; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Ultrafast Tracking of Oxygen Dynamics During Proton FLASH.

Authors:  Mirna El Khatib; Alexander L Van Slyke; Anastasia Velalopoulou; Michele M Kim; Khayrullo Shoniyozov; Srinivasa Rao Allu; Eric E Diffenderfer; Theresa M Busch; Rodney D Wiersma; Cameron J Koch; Sergei A Vinogradov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 8.013

3.  Development of a portable hypoxia chamber for ultra-high dose rate laser-driven proton radiobiology applications.

Authors:  Pankaj Chaudhary; Deborah C Gwynne; Boris Odlozilik; Aaron McMurray; Giuliana Milluzzo; Carla Maiorino; Domenico Doria; Hamad Ahmed; Lorenzo Romagnani; Aaron Alejo; Hersimerjit Padda; James Green; David Carroll; Nicola Booth; Paul McKenna; Satyabrata Kar; Giada Petringa; Roberto Catalano; Francesco P Cammarata; Giuseppe A P Cirrone; Stephen J McMahon; Kevin M Prise; Marco Borghesi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.309

Review 4.  Mechanisms of FLASH effect.

Authors:  Binwei Lin; Dan Huang; Feng Gao; Yiwei Yang; Dai Wu; Yu Zhang; Gang Feng; Tangzhi Dai; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.