Literature DB >> 34129427

All for one, though not one for all: team players in normal tissue radiobiology.

Marjan Boerma1, Catherine M Davis2, Isabel L Jackson3, Dörthe Schaue4, Jacqueline P Williams5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As part of the special issue on 'Women in Science', this review offers a perspective on past and ongoing work in the field of normal (non-cancer) tissue radiation biology, highlighting the work of many of the leading contributors to this field of research. We discuss some of the hypotheses that have guided investigations, with a focus on some of the critical organs considered dose-limiting with respect to radiation therapy, and speculate on where the field needs to go in the future.
CONCLUSIONS: The scope of work that makes up normal tissue radiation biology has and continues to play a pivotal role in the radiation sciences, ensuring the most effective application of radiation in imaging and therapy, as well as contributing to radiation protection efforts. However, despite the proven historical value of preclinical findings, recent decades have seen clinical practice move ahead with altered fractionation scheduling based on empirical observations, with little to no (or even negative) supporting scientific data. Given our current appreciation of the complexity of normal tissue radiation responses and their temporal variability, with tissue- and/or organ-specific mechanisms that include intra-, inter- and extracellular messaging, as well as contributions from systemic compartments, such as the immune system, the need to maintain a positive therapeutic ratio has never been more urgent. Importantly, mitigation and treatment strategies, whether for the clinic, emergency use following accidental or deliberate releases, or reducing occupational risk, will likely require multi-targeted approaches that involve both local and systemic intervention. From our personal perspective as five 'Women in Science', we would like to acknowledge and applaud the role that many female scientists have played in this field. We stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before, some of whom are fellow contributors to this special issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Normal tissue radiobiology; brain; cardiovascular system; immune system; lung

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34129427      PMCID: PMC8781287          DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  295 in total

Review 1.  Radiation effects on the lung: clinical features, pathology, and imaging findings.

Authors:  S D Davis; D F Yankelevitz; C I Henschke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Radiation exposure and longitudinal changes in peripheral monocytes over 50 years: the Adult Health Study of atomic-bomb survivors.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshida; Benjamin French; Noriaki Yoshida; Ayumi Hida; Waka Ohishi; Yoichiro Kusunoki
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Neural Progenitor Cell-Sparing Radiation Therapy Plus Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chengcheng Gui; Tracy D Vannorsdall; Lawrence R Kleinberg; Ryan Assadi; Joseph A Moore; Chen Hu; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Kristin J Redmond
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  The ultrastructure of the lung after exposure to ionizing radiation as seen by transmission and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  J R Maisin; U Van Gorp; L de Saint-Georges
Journal:  Scan Electron Microsc       Date:  1982

5.  Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300,000 women in US SEER cancer registries.

Authors:  Sarah C Darby; Paul McGale; Carolyn W Taylor; Richard Peto
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Inflammation and chronic oxidative stress in radiation-induced late normal tissue injury: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Weiling Zhao; Mike E C Robbins
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Ionizing radiation induces myofibroblast differentiation via lactate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  J L Judge; K M Owens; S J Pollock; C F Woeller; T H Thatcher; J P Williams; R P Phipps; P J Sime; R M Kottmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.464

8.  Universal and radiation-specific loci influence murine susceptibility to radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Christina K Haston; Xinhui Zhou; Laura Gumbiner-Russo; Roxanna Irani; Robert Dejournett; Xiangjun Gu; Michael Weil; Christopher I Amos; Elizabeth L Travis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  BIO 300, a nanosuspension of genistein, mitigates pneumonitis/fibrosis following high-dose radiation exposure in the C57L/J murine model.

Authors:  Isabel L Jackson; Andrew Zodda; Ganga Gurung; Radmila Pavlovic; Michael D Kaytor; Michael A Kuskowski; Zeljko Vujaskovic
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Mouse genetic approaches applied to the normal tissue radiation response.

Authors:  Christina K Haston
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.