Literature DB >> 33052737

Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning to Improve Generalizability of an Automated Prostate Segmentation Model.

Thomas H Sanford1, Ling Zhang2, Stephanie A Harmon1,3, Jonathan Sackett1, Dong Yang2, Holger Roth2, Ziyue Xu2, Deepak Kesani1, Sherif Mehralivand1, Ronaldo H Baroni4, Tristan Barrett5, Rossano Girometti6, Aytekin Oto7, Andrei S Purysko8, Sheng Xu1, Peter A Pinto1, Daguang Xu2, Bradford J Wood1, Peter L Choyke1, Baris Turkbey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Deep learning applications in radiology often suffer from overfitting, limiting generalization to external centers. The objective of this study was to develop a high-quality prostate segmentation model capable of maintaining a high degree of performance across multiple independent datasets using transfer learning and data augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective cohort of 648 patients who underwent prostate MRI between February 2015 and November 2018 at a single center was used for training and validation. A deep learning approach combining 2D and 3D architecture was used for training, which incorporated transfer learning. A data augmentation strategy was used that was specific to the deformations, intensity, and alterations in image quality seen on radiology images. Five independent datasets, four of which were from outside centers, were used for testing, which was conducted with and without fine-tuning of the original model. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to evaluate model performance. RESULTS. When prostate segmentation models utilizing transfer learning were applied to the internal validation cohort, the mean Dice similarity coefficient was 93.1 for whole prostate and 89.0 for transition zone segmentations. When the models were applied to multiple test set cohorts, the improvement in performance achieved using data augmentation alone was 2.2% for the whole prostate models and 3.0% for the transition zone segmentation models. However, the best test-set results were obtained with models fine-tuned on test center data with mean Dice similarity coefficients of 91.5 for whole prostate segmentation and 89.7 for transition zone segmentation. CONCLUSION. Transfer learning allowed for the development of a high-performing prostate segmentation model, and data augmentation and fine-tuning approaches improved performance of a prostate segmentation model when applied to datasets from external centers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; prostate MRI; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33052737      PMCID: PMC8974988          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  Differential Data Augmentation Techniques for Medical Imaging Classification Tasks.

Authors:  Zeshan Hussain; Francisco Gimenez; Darvin Yi; Daniel Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Into the valley of death: research to innovation.

Authors:  John Hudson; Hanan F Khazragui
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Robert Toth; Wendy van de Ven; Caroline Hoeks; Sjoerd Kerkstra; Bram van Ginneken; Graham Vincent; Gwenael Guillard; Neil Birbeck; Jindang Zhang; Robin Strand; Filip Malmberg; Yangming Ou; Christos Davatzikos; Matthias Kirschner; Florian Jung; Jing Yuan; Wu Qiu; Qinquan Gao; Philip Eddie Edwards; Bianca Maan; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Soumya Ghose; Jhimli Mitra; Jason Dowling; Dean Barratt; Henkjan Huisman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Automatic magnetic resonance prostate segmentation by deep learning with holistically nested networks.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Holger R Roth; Nathan Lay; Le Lu; Baris Turkbey; William Gandler; Evan S McCreedy; Tom Pohida; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Matthew J McAuliffe; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

5.  Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen J Gardner; Ning Wen; Jinkoo Kim; Chang Liu; Deepak Pradhan; Ibrahim Aref; Richard Cattaneo; Sean Vance; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty; Mohamed A Elshaikh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Liang Wang; David C Wei; Fergus V Coakley; Oguz Akin; Victor E Reuter; Mithat Gonen; Michael W Kattan; Chinyere N Onyebuchi; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Fully automated segmentation of prostate whole gland and transition zone in diffusion-weighted MRI using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tyler Clark; Junjie Zhang; Sameer Baig; Alexander Wong; Masoom A Haider; Farzad Khalvati
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-17

8.  A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie Harmon; Clayton Smith; Jonathan Bloom; Marcin Czarniecki; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Kareem Rayn; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Variability in prostate and seminal vesicle delineations defined on magnetic resonance images, a multi-observer, -center and -sequence study.

Authors:  Tufve Nyholm; Joakim Jonsson; Karin Söderström; Per Bergström; Andreas Carlberg; Gunilla Frykholm; Claus F Behrens; Poul Flemming Geertsen; Redas Trepiakas; Scott Hanvey; Azmat Sadozye; Jawaher Ansari; Hazel McCallum; John Frew; Rhona McMenemin; Björn Zackrisson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.

Authors:  Abdel Aziz Taha; Allan Hanbury
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.930

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning-based artificial intelligence applications in prostate MRI: brief summary.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Semisupervised Training of a Brain MRI Tumor Detection Model Using Mined Annotations.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Swinburne; Vivek Yadav; Julie Kim; Ye R Choi; David C Gutman; Jonathan T Yang; Nelson Moss; Jacqueline Stone; Jamie Tisnado; Vaios Hatzoglou; Sofia S Haque; Sasan Karimi; John Lyo; Krishna Juluru; Karl Pichotta; Jianjiong Gao; Sohrab P Shah; Andrei I Holodny; Robert J Young
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Machine Learning in Prostate MRI for Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Huanye Li; Chau Hung Lee; David Chia; Zhiping Lin; Weimin Huang; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 4.  Tasks for artificial intelligence in prostate MRI.

Authors:  Mason J Belue; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-07-31

Review 5.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

6.  Automated Final Lesion Segmentation in Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Riaan Zoetmulder; Praneeta R Konduri; Iris V Obdeijn; Efstratios Gavves; Ivana Išgum; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Yvo B W E M Roos; Mayank Goyal; Peter J Mitchell; Bruce C V Campbell; Demetrius K Lopes; Gernot Reimann; Tudor G Jovin; Jeffrey L Saver; Keith W Muir; Phil White; Serge Bracard; Bailiang Chen; Scott Brown; Wouter J Schonewille; Erik van der Hoeven; Volker Puetz; Henk A Marquering
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-04

7.  Harnessing clinical annotations to improve deep learning performance in prostate segmentation.

Authors:  Karthik V Sarma; Alex G Raman; Nikhil J Dhinagar; Alan M Priester; Stephanie Harmon; Thomas Sanford; Sherif Mehralivand; Baris Turkbey; Leonard S Marks; Steven S Raman; William Speier; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.