Literature DB >> 25988718

Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Stephen J Gardner1, Ning Wen, Jinkoo Kim, Chang Liu, Deepak Pradhan, Ibrahim Aref, Richard Cattaneo, Sean Vance, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J Chetty, Mohamed A Elshaikh.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate contouring variability of human-and deformable-generated contours on planning CT (PCT) and CBCT for ten patients with low-or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. For each patient in this study, five radiation oncologists contoured the prostate, bladder, and rectum, on one PCT dataset and five CBCT datasets. Consensus contours were generated using the STAPLE method in the CERR software package. Observer contours were compared to consensus contour, and contour metrics (Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, Contour Distance, Center-of-Mass [COM] Deviation) were calculated. In addition, the first day CBCT was registered to subsequent CBCT fractions (CBCTn: CBCT2-CBCT5) via B-spline Deformable Image Registration (DIR). Contours were transferred from CBCT1 to CBCTn via the deformation field, and contour metrics were calculated through comparison with consensus contours generated from human contour set. The average contour metrics for prostate contours on PCT and CBCT were as follows: Dice coefficient-0.892 (PCT), 0.872 (CBCT-Human), 0.824 (CBCT-Deformed); Hausdorff distance-4.75 mm (PCT), 5.22 mm (CBCT-Human), 5.94 mm (CBCT-Deformed); Contour Distance (overall contour)-1.41 mm (PCT), 1.66 mm (CBCT-Human), 2.30 mm (CBCT-Deformed); COM Deviation-2.01 mm (PCT), 2.78 mm (CBCT-Human), 3.45 mm (CBCT-Deformed). For human contours on PCT and CBCT, the difference in average Dice coefficient between PCT and CBCT (approx. 2%) and Hausdorff distance (approx. 0.5 mm) was small compared to the variation between observers for each patient (standard deviation in Dice coefficient of 5% and Hausdorff distance of 2.0 mm). However, additional contouring variation was found for the deformable-generated contours (approximately 5.0% decrease in Dice coefficient and 0.7 mm increase in Hausdorff distance relative to human-generated contours on CBCT). Though deformable contours provide a reasonable starting point for contouring on CBCT, we conclude that contours generated with B-Spline DIR require physician review and editing if they are to be used in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25988718     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Male pelvic multi-organ segmentation aided by CBCT-based synthetic MRI.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Sibo Tian; Xue Dong; Ashesh B Jani; David Schuster; Walter J Curran; Pretesh Patel; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Optimizing HR-pQCT workflow: a comparison of bias and precision error for quantitative bone analysis.

Authors:  D E Whittier; A N Mudryk; I D Vandergaag; L A Burt; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning to Improve Generalizability of an Automated Prostate Segmentation Model.

Authors:  Thomas H Sanford; Ling Zhang; Stephanie A Harmon; Jonathan Sackett; Dong Yang; Holger Roth; Ziyue Xu; Deepak Kesani; Sherif Mehralivand; Ronaldo H Baroni; Tristan Barrett; Rossano Girometti; Aytekin Oto; Andrei S Purysko; Sheng Xu; Peter A Pinto; Daguang Xu; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Comparison of Automated Atlas-Based Segmentation Software for Postoperative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Grégory Delpon; Alexandre Escande; Timothée Ruef; Julien Darréon; Jimmy Fontaine; Caroline Noblet; Stéphane Supiot; Thomas Lacornerie; David Pasquier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The impact of robustness of deformable image registration on contour propagation and dose accumulation for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lian Zhang; Zhi Wang; Chengyu Shi; Tengfei Long; X George Xu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Improvements in CBCT Image Quality Using a Novel Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: A Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Stephen J Gardner; Weihua Mao; Chang Liu; Ibrahim Aref; Mohamed Elshaikh; Joon K Lee; Deepak Pradhan; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty; Farzan Siddiqui
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-01-10

7.  Novel Wavelet-Based Segmentation of Prostate CBCT Images with Implanted Calypso Transponders.

Authors:  Yingxia Liu; Ziad Saleh; Yulin Song; Maria Chan; Xiang Li; Chengyu Shi; Xin Qian; Xiaoli Tang
Journal:  Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08

8.  Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT.

Authors:  Taka-Aki Hirose; Hidetaka Arimura; Jun-Ichi Fukunaga; Saiji Ohga; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Contrast enhanced oesophageal avoidance for stereotactic body radiotherapy: Barium vs. Gastrografin.

Authors:  Katrina Woodford; Vanessa Panettieri; Jeremy D Ruben; Sidney Davis; Esther Sim; Trieumy Tran Le; Sashendra Senthi
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-16

10.  Implementing user-defined atlas-based auto-segmentation for a large multi-centre organisation: the Australian Experience.

Authors:  Yunfei Hu; Mikel Byrne; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Kenton Thompson; Andrew Fong; Marcel Knesl; Amy Teh; Eve Tiong; Richard Foster; Paul Melnyk; Michelle Burr; Amelia Thompson; Jiy Lim; Luke Moore; Fiona Gordon; Rylie Humble; Anna Hardy; Saul Williams
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.