Literature DB >> 30667329

A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.

Sherif Mehralivand1, Joanna H Shih1, Stephanie Harmon1, Clayton Smith1, Jonathan Bloom1, Marcin Czarniecki1, Samuel Gold1, Graham Hale1, Kareem Rayn1, Maria J Merino1, Bradford J Wood1, Peter A Pinto1, Peter L Choyke1, Baris Turkbey1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate MRI features associated with pathologically defined extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer and to propose an MRI grading system for pathologic EPE. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive male study participants underwent preoperative 3.0-T MRI from June 2007 to March 2017 followed by robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. An MRI-based EPE grading system was defined as follows: curvilinear contact length of 1.5 cm or capsular bulge and irregularity were grade 1, both features were grade 2, and frank capsular breach were grade 3. Multivariable logistic regression and decision curve analyses were performed to compare the MRI grade model and clinical parameters (prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score) for pathologic EPE prediction by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value. Results Among 553 study participants, the mean age was 60 years ± 8 (standard deviation); the median prostate-specific antigen value was 6.3 ng/mL. A total of 125 of 553 (22%) participants had pathologic EPE at radical prostatectomy. Detection of pathologic EPE, defined as number of pathologic EPEs divided by number of participants with individual MRI features, was as follows: curvilinear contact length, 88 of 208 (42%); capsular bulge and irregularity, 78 of 175 (45%); and EPE visible at MRI, 37 of 56 (66%). For MRI, grades 1, 2, and 3 for detection of pathologic EPE were 18 of 74 (24%), 39 of 102 (38%), and 37 of 56 (66%), respectively. Clinical features plus the MRI-based EPE grading system (prostate-specific antigen, International Society of Urological Pathology stage, MRI grade) predicted pathologic EPE better than did MRI grade alone (AUC, 0.81 vs 0.77, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Higher MRI-based extraprostatic extension (EPE) grading categories were associated with a greater risk of pathologic EPE. Clinical features plus MRI grading had the highest diagnostic performance for prediction of pathologic EPE. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Eberhardt in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30667329      PMCID: PMC6394788          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  33 in total

1.  Length of capsular contact for diagnosing extraprostatic extension on prostate MRI: Assessment at an optimal threshold.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Alampady K Shanbhogue; Annie Wang; Max Xiangtian Kong; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Prostate Cancer: The European Society of Urogenital Radiology Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension by Using 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Authors:  Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt; Geert Litjens; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Baris Turkbey; Emerson Leandro Gasparetto; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Joanna H Shih; Sandeep Sankineni; Jamie Marko; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Arvin Koruthu George; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Haresh Mani; Marcelino Bernardo; Yuxi Pang; Yolanda L McKinney; Kiranpreet Khurana; Gregory C Ravizzini; Paul S Albert; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten de Rooij; Esther H J Hamoen; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes.

Authors:  J Mikel Hubanks; Stephen A Boorjian; Igor Frank; Matthew T Gettman; R Houston Thompson; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Diagnostic Utility of a Likert Scale Versus Qualitative Descriptors and Length of Capsular Contact for Determining Extraprostatic Tumor Extension at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; Niccolo M Passoni; John R Leyendecker; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Yair Lotan; Claus G Roehrborn; Susana Otero-Muinelo; Harpreet Grewal; Yin Xi; Franto Francis; Neil M Rofsky; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Mullerad; Hedvig Hricak; Liang Wang; Hui-Ni Chen; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  40 in total

1.  A Grading System for Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer That We Can All Agree Upon?

Authors:  Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17

2.  Artificial intelligence is a promising prospect for the detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with mpMRI: a two-center comparative study.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Yi-Hong Zhang; Jie Bao; Mei-Ling Bao; Guang Yang; Hai-Bin Shi; Yang Song; Yu-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples.

Authors:  Metka Volavšek; Vanessa Henriques; Ana Blanca; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng; Maria R Raspollini; Alessia Cimadamore; Nuno Vau; Francesco Pierconti; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Developing a National Center of Excellence for Prostate Imaging.

Authors:  Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Manuel Madariaga-Venegas; Nicolas Aviles; Juan Carlos Roman; Ivan Gallegos; Mauricio Burotto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Alice C Shieh; Ezgi Guler; Vijayanadh Ojili; Raj Mohan Paspulati; Robin Elliott; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

6.  Mri-based cancer lesion analysis with 3d printed patient specific prostate cutting guides.

Authors:  David R Rutkowski; Shane A Wells; Brian Johnson; Wei Huang; David F Jarrard; Joshua M Lang; Steve Cho; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2019-08-15

7.  Assessing Extraprostatic Extension with Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: Mehralivand Extraprostatic Extension Grade or Extraprostatic Extension Likert Scale?

Authors:  Lars A R Reisæter; Ole J Halvorsen; Christian Beisland; Alfred Honoré; Karsten Gravdal; Are Losnegård; Jan Monssen; Lars A Akslen; Martin Biermann
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17

8.  The absolute tumor-capsule contact length in the diagnosis of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kulyada Eurboonyanun; Nisanard Pisuchpen; Aileen O'Shea; Rita Maria Lahoud; Isha D Atre; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-26

9.  A multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based virtual reality surgical navigation tool for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Abhishek Kolagunda; Kai Hammerich; Vikram Sabarwal; Stephanie Harmon; Thomas Sanford; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Vladimir Valera Romero; Jonathan Bloom; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Chandra Kambhamettu; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-09-01

10.  Prediction of extraprostatic extension on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hyungwoo Ahn; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Hyoung Sim Suh; Gheeyoung Choe; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Kyu Hong; Sangchul Lee; Joongyub Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.