Filip Szczepankiewicz1,2,3, Jens Sjölund4,5, Erica Dall'Armellina6, Sven Plein6, Jürgen E Schneider6, Irvin Teh6, Carl-Fredrik Westin1,2. 1. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 4. Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 6. Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MRI is sensitive to incoherent tissue motion, which may confound the measured signal and subsequent analysis. We propose a "motion-compensated" gradient waveform design for tensor-valued diffusion encoding that negates the effects bulk motion and incoherent motion in the ballistic regime. METHODS: Motion compensation was achieved by constraining the magnitude of gradient waveform moment vectors. The constraint was incorporated into a numerical optimization framework, along with existing constraints that account for b-tensor shape, hardware restrictions, and concomitant field gradients. We evaluated the efficacy of encoding and motion compensation in simulations, and we demonstrated the approach by linear and planar b-tensor encoding in a healthy heart in vivo. RESULTS: The optimization framework produced asymmetric motion-compensated waveforms that yielded b-tensors of arbitrary shape with improved efficiency compared with previous designs for tensor-valued encoding, and equivalent efficiency to previous designs for linear (conventional) encoding. Technical feasibility was demonstrated in the heart in vivo, showing vastly improved data quality when using motion compensation. The optimization framework is available online in open source. CONCLUSION: Our gradient waveform design is both more flexible and efficient than previous methods, facilitating tensor-valued diffusion encoding in tissues in which motion would otherwise confound the signal. The proposed design exploits asymmetric encoding times, a single refocusing pulse or multiple refocusing pulses, and integrates compensation for concomitant gradient effects throughout the imaging volume.
PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MRI is sensitive to incoherent tissue motion, which may confound the measured signal and subsequent analysis. We propose a "motion-compensated" gradient waveform design for tensor-valued diffusion encoding that negates the effects bulk motion and incoherent motion in the ballistic regime. METHODS: Motion compensation was achieved by constraining the magnitude of gradient waveform moment vectors. The constraint was incorporated into a numerical optimization framework, along with existing constraints that account for b-tensor shape, hardware restrictions, and concomitant field gradients. We evaluated the efficacy of encoding and motion compensation in simulations, and we demonstrated the approach by linear and planar b-tensor encoding in a healthy heart in vivo. RESULTS: The optimization framework produced asymmetric motion-compensated waveforms that yielded b-tensors of arbitrary shape with improved efficiency compared with previous designs for tensor-valued encoding, and equivalent efficiency to previous designs for linear (conventional) encoding. Technical feasibility was demonstrated in the heart in vivo, showing vastly improved data quality when using motion compensation. The optimization framework is available online in open source. CONCLUSION: Our gradient waveform design is both more flexible and efficient than previous methods, facilitating tensor-valued diffusion encoding in tissues in which motion would otherwise confound the signal. The proposed design exploits asymmetric encoding times, a single refocusing pulse or multiple refocusing pulses, and integrates compensation for concomitant gradient effects throughout the imaging volume.
Authors: Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Fabio Nery; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Leevi Kerkelä; Matt G Hall; Enrico Kaden; Isky Gordon; David L Thomas; Chris A Clark Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: André Ahlgren; Linda Knutsson; Ronnie Wirestam; Markus Nilsson; Freddy Ståhlberg; Daniel Topgaard; Samo Lasič Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Frederik B Laun; Tobit Führes; Hannes Seuss; Astrid Müller; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Alto Stemmer; Thomas Benkert; Michael Uder; Marc Saake Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Markus Nilsson; Greta Eklund; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Mikael Skorpil; Karin Bryskhe; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Claes Lindh; Lennart Blomqvist; Fredrik Jäderling Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Filip Szczepankiewicz; Jens Sjölund; Erica Dall'Armellina; Sven Plein; Jürgen E Schneider; Irvin Teh; Carl-Fredrik Westin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jan Brabec; Faris Durmo; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Patrik Brynolfsson; Björn Lampinen; Anna Rydelius; Linda Knutsson; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 5.152
Authors: Sean McTavish; Anh T Van; Johannes M Peeters; Kilian Weiss; Marcus R Makowski; Rickmer F Braren; Dimitrios C Karampinos Journal: MAGMA Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Maryam Afzali; Lars Mueller; Ken Sakaie; Siyuan Hu; Yong Chen; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Mark A Griswold; Derek K Jones; Dan Ma Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.737