Literature DB >> 22895881

Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes.

Paul M Bays1, Masud Husain.   

Abstract

Active exploration of the visual world depends on sequential shifts of gaze that bring prioritized regions of a scene into central vision. The efficiency of this system is commonly attributed to a mechanism of "inhibition of return" (IOR) that discourages re-examination of previously-visited locations. Such a process is fundamental to computational models of attentional selection and paralleled by neurophysiological observations of inhibition of target-related activity in visuomotor areas. However, studies examining eye movements in naturalistic visual scenes appear to contradict the hypothesis that IOR promotes exploration. Instead, these reports reveal a surprisingly strong tendency to shift gaze back to the previously fixated location, suggesting that refixations might even be facilitated under natural conditions. Here we resolve this apparent contradiction, based on a probabilistic analysis of gaze patterns recorded during both free-viewing and search of naturalistic scenes. By simulating saccadic selection based on instantaneous influences alone, we show that the observed frequency of return saccades is in fact substantially less than predicted for a memoryless system, demonstrating that refixation is actively inhibited under natural viewing conditions. Furthermore, these observations reveal that gaze history significantly influences the way in which natural scenes are explored, contrary to accounts that suggest visual search has no memory.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22895881      PMCID: PMC3587005          DOI: 10.1167/12.8.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  44 in total

1.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.

Authors:  Tim J Smith; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: a review.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Authors:  C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

6.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  J P Gottlieb; M Kusunoki; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

9.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual short-term memory guides infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Samantha G Mitsven; Lisa M Cantrell; Steven J Luck; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-04-25

2.  Trajectory curvature in saccade sequences: spatiotopic influences vs. residual motor activity.

Authors:  Geoffrey Megardon; Casimir Ludwig; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Scanpath estimation based on foveated image saliency.

Authors:  Yixiu Wang; Bin Wang; Xiaofeng Wu; Liming Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-10-14

4.  Novelty enhances visual salience independently of reward in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Nicholas C Foley; David C Jangraw; Christopher Peck; Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Effects of task and task-switching on temporal inhibition of return, facilitation of return, and saccadic momentum during scene viewing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Attention as foraging for information and value.

Authors:  Sanjay G Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jelmer P De Vries; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Ignace T C Hooge; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Saccadic momentum and facilitation of return saccades contribute to an optimal foraging strategy.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Simon Harst; Nico Schmidt; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  In search of a reliable electrophysiological marker of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Satel; Matthew D Hilchey; Zhiguo Wang; Caroline S Reiss; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.