Literature DB >> 7083450

Etoposide (VP16-213) and teniposide (VM26) comparative in vitro activities in human tumors.

B F Issell, C Tihon, M E Curry.   

Abstract

In order to determine if any inherent sensitivity differences may exist between VP16-213 and VM26 individual human tumors were grown in vitro and drug sensitivities were determined using the soft agar clonogenic assay method. Only nine of the 34 tumors tested so far showed a differing sensitivity to VP16-213 and VM26 as measured by a 25% or greater colony number reduction. However in none of these tumors did this added reduction result in a 70% decrease over control plate colony numbers. As yet we have been unable to demonstrate any clinically meaningful inherent in vitro sensitivity difference between VP16-213 and VM26 in any tumor type tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7083450     DOI: 10.1007/BF00254531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the human pharmacokinetics of VM-26 and VP-16, two antineoplastic epipodophyllotixin glucopyranoside derivatives.

Authors:  L M Allen; P J Creaven
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Direct cloning of human ovarian carcinoma cells in agar.

Authors:  A W Hamburger; S E Salmon; M B Kim; J M Trent; B J Soehnlen; D S Alberts; H J Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Etoposide (VP-16-213).

Authors:  B F Issell; S T Crooke
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  In-vitro clonogenic assay for predicting response of ovarian cancer to chemotherapy.

Authors:  D S Alberts; S E Samon; H S Chen; E A Surwit; B Soehnlen; L Young; T E Moon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Quantitation of differential sensitivity of human-tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs.

Authors:  S E Salmon; A W Hamburger; B Soehnlen; B G Durie; D S Alberts; T E Moon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells.

Authors:  A W Hamburger; S E Salmon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Association between human tumor colony-forming assay results and response of an individual patient's tumor to chemotherapy.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; J Casper; E Bradley; J Sandbach; D Jones; R Makuch
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.965

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current development of podophyllotoxins.

Authors:  R Canetta; P Hilgard; S Florentine; P Bedogni; L Lenaz
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Chemical and biological stability of anticancer drugs used in a human tumor clonogenic assay.

Authors:  R Ludwig; D S Alberts
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Skin ulceration potential without therapeutic anticancer activity for epipodophyllotoxin commercial diluents.

Authors:  R T Dorr; D S Alberts
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Comparison of in vitro activity of epipodophyllotoxins with other chemotherapeutic agents in human medulloblastomas.

Authors:  F H Tomlinson; M G Lihou; P J Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.