Literature DB >> 7647335

Second-line chemotherapy with long-term low-dose oral etoposide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

M Bontenbal1, A S Planting, J Verweij, R de Wit, W H Kruit, G Stoter, J G Klijn.   

Abstract

In a phase II study, 27 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with oral etoposide as second-line chemotherapy at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day for 21 days, which courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response, and twenty-five for toxicity. In two (10%) patients a partial response was observed with a duration of 60 and 122 weeks respectively, and seven patients (33%) showed stable disease. Gastrointestinal toxicity was usually mild, though relatively frequent. Anemia grade II and III was observed in 20% of all courses (< 10% of all measurements), and leukopenia grade III and IV was observed in 22% of all courses (< 10% of all measurements). There was one toxic death. Reviewing the literature we calculated a response rate of intravenous etoposide treatment of 8% in 276 patients with metastatic breast cancer from 7 studies (response rates ranging between 0-14%), while (chronic) oral treatment caused a response rate of 19% in 145 patients from 8 different studies (response rates ranging between 0-35%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7647335     DOI: 10.1007/bf00665790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  19 in total

1.  Phase II evaluation of VP-16-213 (NSC-141540) and cytembena (NSC-104801) in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Ahmann; H F Bisel; R T Eagan; J H Edmonson; R G Hahn; M J O'Connell; S Frytak
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-05

2.  A clinical trial of the oral form of 4'-demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-beta-D ethylidene glucoside (NSC 141540) VP 16-213.

Authors:  G Falkson; J J van Dyk; E B van Eden; A M van der Merwe; J A van den Bergh; H C Falkson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Chronic daily administration of oral etoposide--a phase I trial.

Authors:  J D Hainsworth; D H Johnson; S R Frazier; F A Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  I C Henderson; J C Allegra; T Woodcock; S Wolff; S Bryan; K Cartwright; G Dukart; D Henry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A comparative assessment of the in vitro effects of drugs on cells by means of colony assays or flow microfluorimetry.

Authors:  B T Hill; R D Whelan; H T Rupniak; L Y Dennis; M A Rosholt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L Slevin; P I Clark; S P Joel; S Malik; R J Osborne; W M Gregory; D G Lowe; R H Reznek; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  In vitro cytotoxicity of VP 16 on primary tumor and metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma.

Authors:  M D'Incalci; E Erba; M Vaghi; L Morasca
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-04

Review 8.  Oral etoposide in oncology: an evolving role.

Authors:  R L Comis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Etoposide in the management of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  G W Sledge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis by oral etoposide.

Authors:  Dipak Panigrahy; Arja Kaipainen; Catherine E Butterfield; Deviney M Chaponis; Andrea M Laforme; Judah Folkman; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Studies of Oral Etoposide in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ioannis A Voutsadakis
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-01-01

3.  Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group.

Authors:  F Icli; H Akbulut; A Uner; B Yalcin; E Baltali; M Altinbas; S Coşkun; S Komurcu; M Erkisi; A Demirkazik; F C Senler; O Sencan; A Büyükcelik; C Boruban; H Onur; N Zengin; S D Sak
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Efficacy of oral Etoposide in pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase 2 study.

Authors:  Peng Yuan; Lijun Di; Xiaohui Zhang; Min Yan; Donggui Wan; Li Li; Yongqiang Zhang; Jufen Cai; Hong Dai; Qi Zhu; Ruoxi Hong; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.